The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Review of Behavioral Interventions to Preserve the Environment: Research Since 1980
Abstract
This review integrates and evaluates the environmental-preservation research published during the 1980s. The focus is environmental behavior change as targeted by behavior analysts and others designing interventions to encourage environmental-preservation behavior. A modified taxonomy of behavioral interventions, based on a taxonomy presented by Geller et al., categorizes these reported interventions by antecedent and consequence conditions. Fifty-four studies were categorized and evaluated according to which of these taxonomic interventions were reported. The conclusions were that (a) antecedent conditions using commitment, demonstration, and goal-setting strategies were generally most effective in encouraging environmentally responsible behavior, and (b) consequence conditions were effective in producing behavior change during the experiment's duration. However, some other important findings were that (a) much of the research in this field during the 1980s did not directly compare interventions, (b) few meaningful follow-up measures were reported, and those evaluations that included follow-up assessment showed little maintenance of the behavior changes, and (c) many potentially effective intervention strategies have been ignored (i.e., group interventions and penalties). Suggestions for future directions of research to produce and maintain environmental-preservation behaviors are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Deci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035519 · Cited by 2,559
Katzev, R. D., & Johnson, T. R. (1983) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(83)90006-5 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002 · Cited by 2,668
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002 · Cited by 880
Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916511402673 · Cited by 754
Klang, A., Vikman, P.-Å., & Brattebø, H. (2003) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(02)00167-2 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 275-321
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2012901959
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 60.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review of Behavioral Interventions to Preserve the Environment: Research Since 1980. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916593255001
- The paper
- Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical Review of Behavioral Interventions to Preserve the Environment: Research Since 1980. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.