Cited by 79Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEducational Assessment and PedagogyEducational Assessment and Improvement

Using Curriculum-Based Assessment Data to Make Instructional Decisions

Blankenship, Colleen S.·1985·Exceptional Children

Abstract

This article describes the essential features of curriculum-based assessment (CBA) and provides suggestions for developing them. Special emphasis is placed on describing how teachers can use CBA results to place students into curriculum materials, adjust instruction based on their performance, and evaluate and communicate pupil progress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001440298505200304

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blankenship, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Blankenship, Colleen S.
Venue
Exceptional Children
Published
1985-11
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
233-238
ISSN
  • 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5560
OpenAlex
W1906010401
Cited by
79
References
9
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
curriculum-based assessment, instructional decision-making, special education, student placement, curriculum materials, pedagogical adaptation, progress reporting, assessment data use
MeSH terms
Achievement, Child, Curriculum, Decision Making, Education, Special, Humans, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review