The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examining the Validity of Two Measures for Formative Teaching: Reading Aloud and Maze
Abstract
This study examined the relations among performance on standardized reading tests, two informal measures (reading aloud and maze), and teacher judgment. Subjects were 335 students from Grades 2–6. Correlations between oral reading fluency and two achievement tests varied according to students' grade level, with a declining trend in the coefficients as grade level increased. Correlations between oral reading and achievement tests at the upper grade levels were lower than those reported in previous studies. In contrast, coefficients between performance on maze tasks and achievement tests did not show a similar decline from lower to upper grade levels. Results are discussed in the context of assessment procedures used in formative instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Commission on Reading, 1985, Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading
- 10.1177/001440298505200303 · DOI · Paper page
- Deno S. L., 1988, Reading Progress Monitoring Passages
- 10.1177/001440298204900105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001440299105800306 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312021002449 · doi:10.3102/00028312021002449 · Paper page
- Fuchs L. S., 1990, Identifying an alternative reading measure for curriculum-based measurement
- 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885938 · DOI
- Fuchs L. S., 1990, Effects of instructional consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task
- 10.1177/074193258800900206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0035643 · DOI
- Guthrie J. T., 1974, The Reading Teacher, 28, 161
- 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90010-2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543059003297 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1985.tb01056.x · DOI
- Kaplan A., 1964, The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science
- 10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75 · Paper page
- MacGinitie W. H., 1978, Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests
- Marston D., 1982, Implementation of direct and repeated measurement in the school setting
- Pearson P. D., 1978, Teaching reading comprehension
- Prescott G. A., 1984, Metropolitan Achievement Tests (MAT-6)
- 10.2466/pr0.1982.50.2.673 · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.50.2.673
- Salvia J. A., 1978, Assessment in special and remedial education
- Shinn M. R., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children
- 10.1086/458513 · DOI · Paper page
- Stahl S. A., 1989, Academic achievement and aptitude testing: Practical applications and test reviews, 158
- 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.668 · DOI
- 10.1177/074193258800900106 · doi:10.1177/074193258800900106
Cited by
Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis
Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027627 · Cited by 696
Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719 · Cited by 580
Self-citationFormative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1993.12085636 · Cited by 442
Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading
Miura Wayman, M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401 · Cited by 428
Shinn, M. R., Knutson, N., Good, R. H., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1992.12085629 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M.
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 421-432
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W1860511877
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Validity of Two Measures for Formative Teaching: Reading Aloud and Maze. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001440299305900505
- The paper
- Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the Validity of Two Measures for Formative Teaching: Reading Aloud and Maze. Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.