The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of a study on how experienced naval officers make decisions in a complex, time-pressured command and control setting, the Combat Information Center of AEGIS cruisers. The decision processes invoked by the officers were consistent with the recognition-primed decision model. The majority of decisions concerned situation awareness and diagnosis in which the decision makers used feature-matching and story generation strategies to build situation awareness. Furthermore, awareness of the situation enabled the officers to recognize appropriate actions from published procedures or past experience. A recognitional strategy was used to identify 95% of the actions taken; decision makers compared multiple options in only 4% of the cases. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for framing command-and-control problems, for emphasizing situation awareness, for a descriptive model of decision making, and for designing decision supports.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rasmussen, J. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313160 · Cited by 3,434
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049499 · Cited by 2,039
Cited by
The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A review.
Harrison, Y., & Horne, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.6.3.236 · Cited by 1,238
Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review
Endsley, M. R. (2000) · doi:10.1201/b12461-7 · Cited by 889
Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings
Endsley, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343415572631 · Cited by 501
Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis
Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084879 · Cited by 308
Phillips-Wren, G., & Adya, M. (2020) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2020.1768680 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- KAEMPF, G. L., KLEIN, G., THORDSEN, M. L., & WOLF, S.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 220-231
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2170636621
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872089606380204
- The paper
- KAEMPF, G. L., KLEIN, G., THORDSEN, M. L., & WOLF, S. (1996). Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089606380204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.