The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Abstract
Complexity is not only a feature of the systems we study, it is also a matter of the way in which we organize our thinking about those systems. This second-order complexity invites consideration of the modes of thinking we use to theorize about complexity, and in this article we develop the idea of second-order complexity using Jerome Bruner’s contrast between logico-scientific and narrative modes of thinking. Using Bruner’s framework, we examine and critique dominant forms of thinking about organizational complexity that are rooted in the logico-scientific mode, and suggest alternatives based in the narrative mode. Our evidence for the value of doing this comes from the logic of complexity theory itself, which we claim indicates and supports the use of the narrative mode. The potential contribution of the narrative approach to developing second-order thinking about organizational complexity is demonstrated by taking a narrative approach to the matter of recursiveness. By extension, similar insights are indicated for other features that logico-scientific thinkers commonly attribute to complex systems, including, nonlinearity, indeterminacy, unpredictability and emergence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of the literature is conceptual or theoretical in nature, introducing the complexity approach to a specific area of study (e.g.Leeuwis & Aarts, 2011), providing alternative views or methods to the analysis (e.g.Corman et al., 2002), or reflecting the use of complexity science in the communication research in general (e.g.Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 50,387
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R. K., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,241
The Interpretation of Cultures
Dadze-Arthur, A. F. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,510
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age
Giddens, A. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003060963-59 · Cited by 13,399
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 12,205
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Barrow, J., 1995, Nature’s imagination
- Capra, F., 1988, Uncommon wisdom
- Capra, F., 1996, The web of life
- Clemson, B., 1984, Cybernetics
- Czarniawska-Joerges, B., 1994, Communication Yearbook, 17, 193
- Davis, P., 1990, New Scientist, 1737, 48
- Dyke, C., 1990, The Philosophical Forum, 369
- Genette, G., 1992, The architext
- Kamminga, H., 1990, New Left Review, 181, 49
- MacIntyre, A., 1985, After virtue
- Meyerson, D., 1991, Reframing organizational culture
- Miller, J.G., 1978, Living systems
- Mulkay, M., 1988, On humor
- Pepper, S., 1942, World hypotheses
- Polanyi, M., 1975, Meaning
- Quinn, R., 1988, Paradox and transformation
- Salomon, G., 1993, Distributed cognitions
- Schauer, F., 1991, Playing by the rules
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226750224.001.0001 · DOI
- Shotter, J., 1993, Conversational realities
- Stewart, I., 1993, Predicting the future
- Tsoukas, H., 1994, New thinking in organizational behavior
- von Foerster, H., 1984, The invented reality
- von Glaserfeld, E., 1984, The invented reality
- Waddington, C., 1977, Tools for thought
- Waldrop, M.M., 1992, Complexity
- White, H., 1987, The content of the form
- Wilkins, A., 1983, Reframing organizational culture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change
de Ven, A. H. V., & Poole, M. S. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605056907 · Cited by 1,094
“Some may object that representation of processes in empirical time series and mathematical models overly ‘variabilizes’ them (Tsoukas and Hatch 2001).”
BackgroundGRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE: THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.59330942 · Cited by 850
Self-citationPath Dependence or Path Creation?
Garud, R. B., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x · Cited by 788
“In addition to relational elements, agency also implicates temporal elements (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundA Narrative Approach to Collective Identities*
Brown, A. D. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00609.x · Cited by 576
“Stories do not tell themselves, they are told by storytellers, and are ‘a product of contingent human construction’ (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001, p. 999).”
BackgroundThe Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation
Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. B. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0372 · Cited by 493
“Thus, narratives and innovations coevolve, with one influencing the other over time (Tsoukas and Hatch 2001).”
BackgroundComplexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model
Uhl‐Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007 · Cited by 496
Process thinking in strategic organization
Langley, A. (2007) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127007079965 · Cited by 472
“We need process thinking because traditional cross-sectional models provide a partial picture of the world that evacuates the role of time (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001) and assumes an equilibrium state (Meyer et al., 2005; Bromiley and Papenhausen, 2003).”
BackgroundContextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective
Garud, R. B., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.015 · Cited by 426
“Specifically, entrepreneurs contextualize innovation through their narratives (see Law and Moser, 2012; Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001 for arguments from outside the field of entrepreneurship).”
Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process
Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl‐Bien, M. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005 · Cited by 430
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12219 · Cited by 368
“Yet, the sad truth is that, in strategy research, most theorizing (especially be more precise, cannot handle time, except in a spatialized, “abstract” manner - time as a series of snapshots (Guerlac, 2015: 30-33; Sandberg and Tsoukas, 2011; Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
Self-citationManaging flow: a process theory of the knowledge-based firm
Edwards, J. S. (2009) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2008.39 · Cited by 354
Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action
Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W. C. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2499 · Cited by 333
Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry
Déjean, F., Gond, J., & Leca, B. L. (2004) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726704044954 · Cited by 318
“Tsoukas and Hatch (2001) argue that in such complex situations researchers should privilege qualitative and narrative approaches; approaches that attempt to render actors’ interpretations.”
BackgroundComplexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation
Garud, R. B., Gehman, J., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410810 · Cited by 330
Authentic leadership and the narrative self
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.004 · Cited by 494
Discourse and Audience: Organizational Change as Multi‐Story Process
Buchanan, D., & Dawson, P. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00669.x · Cited by 262
Garud, R. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x · Cited by 236
How Do Organizations Learn Lessons From Projects—And Do They?
Williams, T. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2007.912920 · Cited by 222
“Tsoukas and Hatch [44] give an important paper on complexity and the subsequent need for narratives, differentiating between logico-scientific and narrative thinking, and explaining how, because of the na-”
BackgroundInfluentialTheoretical Foundations of an International Entrepreneurial Culture
Dimitratos, P., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2003) · Journal of International Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1023/a:1023804318244 · Cited by 227
Paradox And Theorizing Within The Resource-Based View
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, P., & Kroll, M. J. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379627 · Cited by 209
How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools?
Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S., & Blettner, D. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01082.x · Cited by 196
“Moreover, given our increasingly complicated world, we believe tools that help ‘differentiate’ ideas whilst simultaneously ‘integrating’ them to generate new insights will be perceived as more useful (see Bartunek et al., 1983; Martin, 2007b; Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
In Search ofPhronesis: Leadership and the Art of Judgment
Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0201 · Cited by 207
“…setting is similar to that faced by Olson, namely when practitioners are simultaneously pulled in different directions, knowing that they need to find a way of attending to several frames at once (e.g., moral, legal, and business frames; Badaracco, 2002, 2006; Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001; Weick, 2001).”
Self-citationDealing with Unusual Experiences: A Narrative Perspective on Organizational Learning
Garud, R. B., Dunbar, R. L. M., & Bartel, C. A. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0536 · Cited by 193
“" The property that allows the mutual definition of the whole and its parts in a narrative (Ricoeur 1984, Tsoukas and Hatch 2001) is also the property that enables organizational actors to gradually create meaning around unusual experiences.”
BackgroundInfluentialYagi, N., & Kleinberg, J. (2011) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2011.10 · Cited by 186
“Many organizations today, especially global ones, exhibit a complexity that Tsoukas and Hatch (2001) characterize by dynamic processes, unpredictability, novelty, and emergent forms.”
BackgroundLorino, P., Tricard, B., & Clot, Y. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410807 · Cited by 183
Leadership Development as Identity Construction
Carroll, B. J., & Levy, L. S. (2010) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318909358725 · Cited by 182
“We sought to find “nuances of event, relationship, and purpose” (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001, p. 998) that offer glimpses into the meaning making of social actors as they choose to be subjects.”
BackgroundCocreating Rigorous and Relevant Knowledge
Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0487 · Cited by 172
Afterword: why language matters in the analysis of organizational change
Tsoukas, H. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534810510579878 · Cited by 170
“Through representing routines as genres of speech organizational members frame (“freeze”) commonly available experience and stabilize meaning, thus producing stability, while by narrativizing representations (speech genres) organizational members create the conditions for the destabilization of meaning and thus change…”
BackgroundSelf-citationRetelling Stories in Organizations: Understanding the Functions of Narrative Repetition
Dailey, S. L., & Browning, L. D. (2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0329 · Cited by 186
“Also, each telling or reading of a story produces another layer of context (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundA problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process
Gregory, A., Atkins, J. P., Daryl Burdon, B., & Elliott, M. (2012) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.020 · Cited by 151
How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410825 · Cited by 156
“The first is a construction of the environment in their minds, which entails a subjective interpretation of external complexity (see Taylor 2001; Tsoukas & Hatch 2001) – in effect ‘sensemaking’ (Weick 1995).”
BackgroundComplexity Theory and Strategic Change: an Empirically Informed Critique*
Houchin, K., & MacLean, D. (2005) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00427.x · Cited by 155
Complexity theory and leadership practice: A review, a critique, and some recommendations
Rosenhead, J., Franco, L. A., Grint, K., & Friedland, B. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.07.002 · Cited by 210
Performing phronesis : On the way to engaged judgment
Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507614541196 · Cited by 151
Self-citationMousavi, R., Introna, L. D., & Hultin, L. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15887 · Cited by 164
“connections among events, but also to preserve multiple temporalities (Tsoukas and Hatch 2001), especially kairotic timing.”
BackgroundProcess research in strategy formation: Theory, methodology and relevance
Sminia, H. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00253.x · Cited by 153
Adaptive and Generative Learning: Implications from Complexity Theories
Chiva, R., Botella, A. G., & Alegre, J. (2008) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00255.x · Cited by 144
Toward Green Narrative: Management and the Evolutionary Epic
Starkey, K., & Crane, A. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.9416086 · Cited by 134
“" Wilson (1978) has been perhaps the most influential in attempting to foster reenchantment through an alignment of social theory and natural science.”
BackgroundGkeredakis, M., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Barrett, M. (2021) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100344 · Cited by 173
“Our main premise in initiating this debate is that crisis creates and exacerbates complexity, which “ is not only a feature of the systems we study, [but] it is also a matter of the way in which we organize our thinking about those systems ” (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001, p. 979).”
BackgroundCollaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine
PAUL, D. L. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222220406 · Cited by 135
“Knowledge creation and discovery often occurs through narratives and demonstrations, and is a process of translation as well as diffusion [54, 55, 57].”
BackgroundAn Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility at Credit Line: A Narrative Approach
Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9426-0 · Cited by 135
“A narrative perspective also gives ‘access to and appreciation of context’, or specific characters, events and relationships, that yield sensitivity to salient situational particularities (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001: 998-999).”
BackgroundStrategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127017733142 · Cited by 134
“Even the most morally committed organization will necessarily ground its explicit value commitments to tacitly held assumptions and unspecified morals (Anteby, 2013; Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001: 994).”
BackgroundSelf-citationReflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management
Henriksen, H. J., & Barlebo, H. C. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.009 · Cited by 124
“This brings us to an analysis of the way BNs influence organising participatory processes and second order complexity (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundEnacting Airports: Space, Movement and Modes of Ordering
Knox, H., O’Doherty, D. P., Vurdubakis, T., & Westrup, C. (2008) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508408095818 · Cited by 121
Narrative Persuasion, Causality, Complex Integration, and Support for Obesity Policy
Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., Kim, H. K., Bartolo, D., & Porticella, N. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.761805 · Cited by 119
“This significant indirect effect is consistent with the assertion that narratives hold potential to help readers see the causes of social problems, and strategies to address them, in a multifaceted and complex way (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundLearning in owner-managed small firms: Mediating artefacts and strategic space
Jones, O., Macpherson, A., & Thorpe, R. (2010) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985620903171368 · Cited by 118
“A range of tools and processes have emerged that promote reflexivity including the use of narratives and metaphors (Argyris 2006; Tsoukas and Hatch 2001).”
BackgroundCyber-threat intelligence for security decision-making: A review and research agenda for practice
Ainslie, S., Thompson, D., Maynard, S. B., & Ahmad, A. (2023) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103352 · Cited by 148
Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing
Kuepers, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270510630006 · Cited by 109
“With this, it can build the basis for actionable knowing particularly for complex thinking and complex practice ( Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001”
BackgroundAgainst the Tyranny of PowerPoint: Technology-in-Use and Technology Abuse
Gabriel, Y. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607079536 · Cited by 106
Reiman, T., & Oedewald, P. (2006) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.010 · Cited by 107
The role of scenarios as prospective sensemaking devices
Wright, A. (2005) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251740510572506 · Cited by 109
“Deductive strategy making stands comparison with Bruner's logico-scientific mode of thinking which characterizes this approach as: top-down, theory driven, de-contextualized and consistent, and as involving argument, tight analysis, reason, Aristotelian logic and proof ( Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001”
MethodMowles, C., Stacey, R. D., & Griffin, D. (2008) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.1497 · Cited by 100
Complex, but not quite complex enough: The turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship
Mowles, C. (2014) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389014527885 · Cited by 100
Narratives and Stories in Organizational Life
Gabriel, Y. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118458204.ch14 · Cited by 97
Coping with the future: developing organizational foresightfulness
Tsoukas, H., & Shepherd, J. (2003) · Futures · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(03)00146-0 · Cited by 95
Self-citationThe appropriated language: Dominant stories as a source of organizational inertia
Näslund, L., & Pemer, F. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726711424322 · Cited by 97
“The need for narratives and storytelling arises from the fragmented and contradictory nature of organizational events: stories serve as a device to bring order to the flux of organizing, and thus instil meaning and connection, which would otherwise be largely absent (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundTsoukas, H., & Dooley, K. J. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410805 · Cited by 94
“For example, seeking to explain the high reliability of an aircraft carrier, Weick and Roberts (1993) use the concept of ‘collective mind’.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTourish, D. (2018) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618789207 · Cited by 98
“This view is consistent with wider process theorising in organization studies (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundResultTechnological exaptation: a narrative approach
Garud, R. B., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2016) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtv050 · Cited by 99
Identity work as a response to tensions: A re-narration in opera rehearsals
Beech, N., Gilmore, C., Cochrane, E., et al. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2011.12.005 · Cited by 91
Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
Belrhiti, Z., Giralt, A. N., & Marchal, B. (2018) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.75 · Cited by 99
Narratives and Organizational Dynamics
Geiger, D., & Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2009) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886309336402 · Cited by 90
Barriers to leadership development: Why is it so difficult to abandon the hero?
Schweiger, S., Müller, B., & Güttel, W. H. (2020) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715020935742 · Cited by 87
Not quite a revolution: Scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies
Lindebaum, D., & Zundel, M. (2013) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713482151 · Cited by 92
Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring
Shaw, D., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2003) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601581 · Cited by 78
“Others talk about the role of strategic or ‘good’ conversations 27,10 —what does this mean?”
BackgroundInfluentialPath Dependence or Path Creation?
Garud, R. B., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00914.x · Cited by 77
Savelsbergh, C. M. J. H., Havermans, L. A., & Storm, P. M. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.005 · Cited by 75
Knowledge in Four Deformation Dimensions
Tywoniak, S. A. (2007) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508407071860 · Cited by 75
“…Job The perspective of complexity frames managers in a paradoxical situation: because they are part of the causal loops they try to comprehend, their understanding is imperfect and their actions impact with unintended consequences the processes they are trying to control (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialBento, F., Bottino, A. G., Pereira, F. C., de Almeida, J. F., & Rodrigues, F. G. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11090492 · Cited by 84
Talent Management: The Good, the Bad, and the Possible
Painter‐Morland, M., Kirk, S., Deslandes, G., et al. (2018) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12171 · Cited by 72
“Foucault ’ s genealogical analysis reminds us of the importance of considering time and space, but not necessarily in order to control it (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
Niederdeppe, J., Kim, H. K., Lundell, H. C., Fazili, F., & Frazier, B. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x · Cited by 77
Progressive Outcomes: A framework for maturing in agile software development
Fontana, R. M., Meyer, V., Reinehr, S., & Malucelli, A. (2014) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.032 · Cited by 74
“We recognize that the narrative approach for research is compatible with the need to appreciate the complexity of organizations (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2005).”
Dawson, P., & McLean, P. (2013) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601112472367 · Cited by 67
Explaining the Performance of Human Resource Management
Fleetwood, S., & Hesketh, A. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781100 · Cited by 69
Mediating ambiguity: Narrative identity and knowledge workers
Mallett, O., & Wapshott, R. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2011.12.001 · Cited by 64
How Narrative Focus and a Statistical Map Shape Health Policy Support Among State Legislators
Niederdeppe, J., Roh, S., & Dreisbach, C. (2015) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.998913 · Cited by 60
“Some of these studies argue that narratives, due to their inherently causal nature, have a persuasive advantage over other message forms in conveying causal information about social issues (Lundell, Niederdeppe, & Clarke, 2013a; Niederdeppe et al., 2013; Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundA Temporal Narrative View of Sensemaking
Hernès, T., & Obstfeld, D. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877221131585 · Cited by 63
“…and that actors employ narrative to capture ongoing activity by meaningfully connecting and reconnecting past and future events to establish their trajectory through time (Cunliffe & Coupland, 2011; Sandberg & Tsoukas, 2015; Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001; Weick, 1995; Weick, Sutcliffe, & Obstfeld, 2005).”
BackgroundTrenholm, S., & Ferlie, E. B. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.001 · Cited by 56
Mapping a complex system: what influences teacher learning during initial teacher education?
Ell, F. R., Haigh, M. A., Cochran‐Smith, M., Grudnoff, L., Ludlow, L. H., & Hill, M. (2017) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2017.1309640 · Cited by 56
“…in a complexity theory framework “Second order complexity” (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001) is the domain of thinking about complexity rather than thinking with complexity, and it can “expose epistemological and methodological issues that have important implications” (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001, p.981).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCampbell‐Hunt, C. (2007) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726707079202 · Cited by 54
“…2006); and for this reason are accessible to the conscious representations of schemata (Balogun & Johnson, 2004; Jarzabkowski, 2004), scripts (Barley & Tolbert, 1997) and narratives (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001) used in social discourse – what Giddens calls our discoursive consciousness (1979).”
BackgroundMethodSubjects of Inquiry: Statistics, Stories, and the Production of Knowledge
AINSWORTH, S., & Hardy, C. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612457616 · Cited by 53
“Stories or narratives1 also play an important role in producing knowledge (Berry, 2001; Currie & Brown, 2003; Lanzara & Patriotta, 2001; Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundSimons, J. (2008) · New Review of Film and Television Studies · doi:10.1080/17400300802098263 · Cited by 51
Complexity theory and tourism policy research
Stevenson, N., Airey, D., & Miller, G. A. (2009) · International Journal of Tourism Policy · doi:10.1504/ijtp.2009.024553 · Cited by 51
“It draws from research by Blackman, 2001; Byrne 2001, Fonseca, 2002; Harvey, 2001; Medd, 2001 a,b; Stacey, 2003; Shaw, 2002 and Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001 and investigates their relevance to understanding tourism policy within its social and relational context.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNarratives in knowledge sharing: challenging validity
Geiger, D., & Schreyögg, G. (2012) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673271211198963 · Cited by 49
Organizational Learning in Project-Based Companies: A Process Thinking Approach
Koskinen, K. U. (2012) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21266 · Cited by 57
“…extensive process thinking practice is needed, because the above-mentioned traditional project model provides only a partial picture of the world that evacuates the role of time (Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001) and assumes a state of equilibrium (Bromiley & Papenhausen, 2003; Meyer, Gaba, & Colwell, 2005).”
BackgroundAdvancing a pragmatist epistemology in organisational research
Ruwhiu, D. R., & Cone, M. H. (2010) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465641011068884 · Cited by 48
A systematic assessment on COVID ‐19 preparedness and transition strategy in Bangladesh
Biswas, R. K., Huq, S., Afiaz, A., & Khan, H. T. A. (2020) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13467 · Cited by 48
Learning in times of dynamic complexity through balancing phenomenal qualities of sensemaking
Guiette, A., & Vandenbempt, K. (2015) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507615592112 · Cited by 50
Strategic resource or ideal source? Discourse, organizational change and CSR
Kemp, D., Keenan, J., & Gronow, J. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534811011071298 · Cited by 46
“In terms of the model, it appears that there are degrees of performativity and connectivity and “tipping points” within each circuit which, if not achieved, serve to “short circuit” discursive activity, a point also alluded to by Tsoukas and Hatch (2005)”
BackgroundEmerging (internet) industry and agglomeration: Internet entrepreneurs coping with uncertainty
Jansson, J. (2011) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985620903505987 · Cited by 45
“Emerging industries should be viewed as complex environments in which many influences interact (Zimmerman and Zeitz 2002) and are arguable, such complex contexts are well-suited for qualitative and narrative approaches (Tsoukas and Hatch 2001).”
BackgroundWhy and how do project management offices change? A structural analysis approach
Bredillet, C. N., Tywoniak, S. A., & Tootoonchy, M. (2018) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.001 · Cited by 54
Sociological contributions to futures’ theory building
Karlsen, J. E., Øverland, E. F., & Karlsen, H. (2010) · foresight · doi:10.1108/14636681011049884 · Cited by 44
“), or even time stretching ( Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001”
BackgroundUnderstanding network picture complexity: An empirical analysis of contextual factors
Ramos, C., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2010) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.12.001 · Cited by 48
“A different notion of complexity is that of ‘second-order’ complexity (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA Knowledge-based View of Agenda-formation in the Development of Human Resource Information Systems
Tansley, C., & Newell, S. (2007) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507607073028 · Cited by 43
“In this, we agree with Tsoukas and Hatch (2001: 997) that there is a tendency that ‘when the narrative statement and the act of narrating are considered together the position of the narrator (along with the motives of the narrator) becomes an issue for reflection’.”
MethodChoosing your words carefully: Leaders' narratives of complex emergent problem resolution
Havermans, L. A., Keegan, A., & den Hartog, D. D. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.001 · Cited by 41
“His study demonstrates how narratives can be a ‘means by which we organize and make sense of our experience’ (Cunliffe and Coupland, 2012), and narrating can provide a context for sensemaking (Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001), while narratives are also outcomes of collective sensemaking processes.”
BackgroundChanging HR functional forms in the UK public sector
Truss, C. (2009) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190902770539 · Cited by 43
“In such complex systems, distinguishing cause from effect can be problematic, as relationships tend to be non-linear and sensitive to initial conditions (Richardson and Cilliers 2001 ; Tsoukas and Hatch 2001 ; Colbert 2004 ; Houchin and Maclean 2005 ).”
BackgroundPoulis, K., & Poulis, E. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0073 · Cited by 41
Othering diversity – a Levinasian analysis of diversity management
Muhr, S. L. (2008) · International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy · doi:10.1504/ijmcp.2008.021273 · Cited by 41
“Stories, therefore, bring valuable social knowledge of individual meaning constructions (see also Czarniawska, 1998; Tsoukas and Hatch, 2001; Hansen, 2006).”
BackgroundMacIntosh, R., MacLean, D., & Seidl, D. N. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777882.020 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tsoukas, Haridimos
- ORCID
- Hatch, Mary Jo
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 979-1013
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2137373608
- Semantic Scholar
- 11ac8f21ef439d6b4f53d6b2a123cd618bbe8d42
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 167
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- organizational complexity, narrative thinking, Bruner, complexity theory, recursiveness, nonlinearity, indeterminacy, unpredictability, emergence, complex systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review