The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective
Open accessAbstract
While the strategy-as-practice research agenda has gained considerable momentum over the past five years, many challenges still remain in developing it into a robust field of research. In this editorial, we define the study of strategy from a practice perspective and propose five main questions that the strategy-as-practice agenda seeks to address. We argue that a coherent approach to answering these questions may be facilitated using an overarching conceptual framework of praxis, practices and practitioners. This framework is used to explain the key challenges underlying the strategy-as-practice agenda and how they may be examined empirically. In discussing these challenges, we refer to the contributions made by existing empirical research and highlight under-explored areas that will provide fruitful avenues for future research. The editorial concludes by introducing the articles in the special issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776 · Cited by 3,021
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks
Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072005 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda
Vial, G. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 · Cited by 7,337
New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy
Constantiou, I. D., & Kallinikos, J. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.17 · Cited by 526
Perifanis, N.-A., & Kitsios, F. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14020085 · Cited by 407
The corporeality of practice-based learning
Yakhlef, A. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609357384 · Cited by 166
Cayrat, C., & Boxall, P. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-08-2021-0238 · Cited by 41
Kashan, A. J., & Mohannak, K. (2019) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.28 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-27
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2161941020
- Cited by
- 1,371
- References
- 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.