The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict
Open accessAbstract
Does working from home on a given day complicate or rather facilitate combining work and home roles that day, why and for whom? To answer these questions, we examined how a teleworking day affects daily work-to-home conflict and daily home-to-work conflict. Based on boundary theory, we expected these relationships to be mediated by daily role transitions and moderated by employees’ preferences to protect their home(/work) domain from work(/home) interruptions. Hypotheses were tested through multilevel moderated mediation modeling using diary data collected during 14 consecutive workdays with 81 employees ( N = 678 data points). In line with our expectations, employees were found to make more work-to-home transitions (i.e. interruptions of work activities to deal with home demands during work hours) on teleworking days, which was related to lower work-to-home conflict but higher home-to-work conflict on these days. They also made more home-to-work transitions (i.e. interruptions of home activities to deal with work demands after hours) on teleworking days, which was related to more work-to-home conflict on these days. The latter effect was stronger for employees with a home protection preference. There was no moderating impact of work protection preference. Overall, employees experienced less work-to-home conflict but more home-to-work conflict on teleworking days compared to non-teleworking days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Wood, S. N. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x · Cited by 7,537
Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258214 · Cited by 6,427
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research.
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278 · Cited by 2,767
Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109351241 · Cited by 2,706
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 · Cited by 2,616
Construction and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Work–Family Conflict
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713 · Cited by 2,437
A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents
Byron, K. (2005) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009 · Cited by 2,336
Cited by
Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12290 · Cited by 1,722
An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1800417 · Cited by 719
Wöhrmann, A. M., & Ebner, C. (2021) · New Technology Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12208 · Cited by 158
Carvalho, V. S., Santos, A., Ribeiro, M. T., & Chambel, M. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137339 · Cited by 75
Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., & Santos, A. (2023) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2063064 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Delanoeije, J., Verbruggen, M., & Germeys, L.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-02-15
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1843-1868
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2913154647
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 61.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0018726718823071
- The paper
- Delanoeije, J., Verbruggen, M., & Germeys, L. (2019). Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
