Cited by 1,652Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object

Fishbein, Martin·1963·Human Relations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872676301600302

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results of studies have generally supported the hypothesized relation between salient beliefs and attitudes, although the magnitude of this relation has sometimes been disappointing.

    “The results have generally supported the hypothesized relation between salient beliefs and attitudes, although the magnitude of this relation has sometimes been disappointing.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Fishbein, 1963

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fishbein, M.
Corresponding author
Fishbein, Martin
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1963-08
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
233-239
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2103591548
Cited by
1,652
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 71
FWCI
83.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
attitude formation, object evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review