Cited by 340Behavioral Health and InterventionsEconomic and Environmental ValuationConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein

Warshaw, Paul R.·1980·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

The Fishbein intention model often produces weak and inconsistent predictions in marketing applications. Of equal concern, high multicollinearity between independent variables is typical. A new intention model was developed and tested. Results show high stability, reliability, and predictiveness across diverse test products, with very low intercorrelations between explanatory variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224378001700201

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warshaw, P. R.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Warshaw, Paul R.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
1980-05
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
153-172
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W1973144792
Cited by
340
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
attitude-behavior relationship, multicollinearity, marketing applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review