Cited by 321Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation and Cyber Security

Exploring the Security of Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Control of Information

Open access
Hajli, Nick, Lin, Xiaolin·2016·Journal of Business Ethics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajli, N., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hajli, Nick
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
111-123
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W1986606224
Cited by
321
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9
FWCI
39.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
social networking sites, information sharing, privacy risks, information security, gender differences, moderating effect, user privacy concerns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review