The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations
Abstract
A model is developed that stipulates that task, roles, and reward distribution of organizational structure, perceived goal interdependence, patterns of behavior, and corporate values and interpersonal attitudes form causal loops, and mutually reinforce and sustain each other. Positive and negative goal interdependencies and independence have been identified and result in much different dynamics and outcomes. Studies overall indicate that positive interdependence promotes coordination and productivity. Research is needed to determine generalizability of these findings and to identify the purposes and. situations when negative interdependence and independence are appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47 · Cited by 1,588
Cooperative and Competitive Relationships Between Leaders and Subordinates
Tjosvold, D., Andrews, R., & Jones, H. (1983) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678303601203 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Cited by
In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development
Williams, M. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845794 · Cited by 720
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310383911 · Cited by 423
Identity Confirmation Networks and Cooperation in Work Groups
Milton, L. P., & Westphal, J. D. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.16928393 · Cited by 212
Productive organizational collaboration: The role of values and cooperation
Tjosvold, D., & Tsao, Y. (1989) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030100209 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tjosvold, D.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 517-540
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2138253021
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872678603900603
- The paper
- Tjosvold, D. (1986). The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603900603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
