Cited by 197Schizophrenia research and treatmentFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessHomelessness and Social Issues

Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of the Social Network in Schizophrenic Patients Living in the Community. Relationship To Sociodemographic Characteristics and Clinical Factors and Subjective Quality of Life

Bengtsson-Tops, Anita, Hansson, Lars·2001·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative aspects of the social network were investigated in a sample of 120 schizophrenic out-patients. Sociodemographic and clinical factors as well as subjective quality of life were investigated as to their relationship to the social network. The Interview Schedule for Social Integration (ISSI) was used to assess social network and Lancashire Quality of Life Profile was used to assess subjective quality of life. Psychopathology was measured by BPRS and psycho social functioning by GAF. The patients reported a significantly worse social network compared to a normal sample both regarding quantitative and qualitative aspects of the network. Alrnost half of the patients wanted access to more social contacts. Relatives and friends turned out to be the patient's main source of supportive contacts. More severe negative and positive symptoms were related to a worse social network. Support was found for an association between characteristics of the social network, such as satisfaction with social contacts, and quality of life. The results give reason to suggest that the care system should consider the informal caregivers' situation and focus on interventions, which enhance the patient's satisfaction with social contacts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002076400104700307

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bengtsson-Tops, A., & Hansson, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2001-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2073448360
Cited by
196
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
schizophrenia, social networks, subjective quality of life, social integration, negative symptoms, positive symptoms, informal caregivers, sociodemographic factors, psychosocial functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review