Cited by 21Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

The subjective experience of community treatment orders: Patients’ views and clinical correlations

Newton-Howes, Giles, Banks, Doug·2014·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There is little objective evidence to support the use of community treatment orders (CTOs) from randomized controlled trials. Qualitative research indicates more negative than positive responses to the use of CTOs. Nonetheless, the use of CTOs is growing internationally. There is no research to identify for whom CTOs may be a positive experience. Aim: To assess patients’ perspectives of CTOs, assessing for correlates with clinical and demographic variables. Methods: Patients currently or previously subject to a CTO were assessed quantitatively to identify their experience. Demographic data, the experience of coercion, views of detention, satisfaction with care, social functioning and psychopathology were correlated using SPSS. Results: Fifty-three per cent of patients felt that they were, on balance, better off when treated informally in the community. Patients described greater coercion and less satisfaction with care when subject to a CTO. These factors, and being in employment, identified patients whom felt harmed by CTOs 61% of the time. Conclusions: This paper highlights that more than half of patients under a CTO consider it negatively. This group is identified by patients who work, experience coercion and are unsatisfied with care. This has implications for the application of CTOs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764013498870

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newton-Howes, G., & Banks, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Whatever It Takes (WIT), Napier, New Zealand
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2013-08-27
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
474-481
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2086102075
Cited by
21
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
community treatment orders, involuntary psychiatric treatment, patient experience, coercion, satisfaction with care, social functioning, psychopathology, employment, forensic psychiatry
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review