Cited by 45

Intergenerational and cross-cultural differences in emotional wellbeing, mental health service utilisation, treatment-seeking preferences and acceptability of psychological treatments for Arab Australians

Kayrouz, Rony, Dear, Blake F, Johnston, Luke, Keyrouz, Liliane, Nehme, Edmond, Laube, Roy, Titov, Nickolai·2015·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the intergenerational and cross-cultural differences in emotional wellbeing and acceptability of psychological treatments for Arab Australians. Aim: To contribute to the emerging data about the mental health status and needs of Arab Australians. Method: An Internet survey examined psychological distress and functional impairment as measured by the Kessler 10 Item scale (K-10) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) among Arab Australians. Additional questions enquired about their help-seeking behaviours, barriers to accessing psychological treatments and preferences for delivery of psychological treatments. A total of 252 participants were recruited through public talks, media and online promotions. Results: Forty-three percent of the respondents reported moderate-to-severe functional impairment ( M = 9.5; standard deviation ( SD ) = 1.8), 32% reported high psychological distress ( M = 28.5; SD = 5.4) and 30% were born overseas. First-generation Arab Australians experiencing high psychological distress (i.e. K-10 ≥ 22), reported a greater preference for Internet-delivered treatment when compared to their second-generation counterparts. Only 18% of the sample reported seeking help from a mental health professional in the past year. The significant barriers reported by respondents with high psychological distress were poor mental health literacy, lack of time and stigma. Respondents preferred face-to-face (90%) over Internet-delivered treatment (55%). Finally, Arab Australians experienced higher psychological distress and underutilised mental health services when compared to the Australian population. Conclusion: Targeted public health campaigns that make culturally relevant interventions such as modifying existing Internet-delivered treatment for Arab Australians may reduce barriers and increase treatment options for this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764014553004

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to treatment for Arab people include low mental health literacy, lack of time, and shame associated with seeking mental health treatment.

    “Barriers to treatment for Arab people appear to be similar to those experienced by people living in Western countries, and include low mental health literacy, lack of time and the shame associated with seeking mental health treatment (Gearing et al., 2012, Kayrouz et al., 2014, Kayrouz et al., 2015a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kayrouz, R., Dear, B. F., Johnston, L., Keyrouz, L., Nehme, E., Laube, R., & Titov, N.
Affiliations
  • eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Quest for Excellence, Menai, NSW, Australia
  • Transcultural Mental Health Centre, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
484-491
ISSN
  • 0020-7640
  • 1741-2854
Cited by
45
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review