Cited by 208Public Policy and Administration ResearchEmployee Performance and ManagementJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government

Ritz, Adrian·2009·International Review of Administrative Sciences

Abstract

During the last 20 years public sector reforms focused on the increase of organizational performance mainly by implementing managerial tools and methods. The one-sided, output-oriented reforms meet with criticism. In our study we focus on the links between employee attitudes, managerial measures, institutional factors and organizational performance. Therefore, three attitudinal constructs, public service motivation, organizational commitment and job satisfaction, are analysed. The study empirically tests the effects of these dimensions on perceived performance in the federal administration of Switzerland. The analysed data of 13,532 federal employees give insight into the importance of employee commitment to the public interest and the need for goal-oriented management techniques. The results are discussed in light of previous studies. Points for practitioners Public administration research raises more and more criticism against New Public Management reforms. This study, however, shows that there is an important link between managerial techniques and the individual perception of organizational performance in administrative practice. There are a range of private management tools immigrating into the public sector. But for the tools to be effective, practitioners need to integrate them with consideration of the specific requirements of the employee's commitment to the public interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020852308099506

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritz, A.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Ritz, Adrian
Venue
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Published
2009-03
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
53-78
ISSN
  • 0020-8523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7226
OpenAlex
W2012151694
Cited by
208
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
FWCI
29.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Administrative Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
public service motivation, organizational performance, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, New Public Management, public sector reform, federal employees, employee attitudes, goal-oriented management, perceived performance, public interest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review