Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government
Abstract
During the last 20 years public sector reforms focused on the increase of organizational performance mainly by implementing managerial tools and methods. The one-sided, output-oriented reforms meet with criticism. In our study we focus on the links between employee attitudes, managerial measures, institutional factors and organizational performance. Therefore, three attitudinal constructs, public service motivation, organizational commitment and job satisfaction, are analysed. The study empirically tests the effects of these dimensions on perceived performance in the federal administration of Switzerland. The analysed data of 13,532 federal employees give insight into the importance of employee commitment to the public interest and the need for goal-oriented management techniques. The results are discussed in light of previous studies. Points for practitioners Public administration research raises more and more criticism against New Public Management reforms. This study, however, shows that there is an important link between managerial techniques and the individual perception of organizational performance in administrative practice. There are a range of private management tools immigrating into the public sector. But for the tools to be effective, practitioners need to integrate them with consideration of the specific requirements of the employee's commitment to the public interest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Public employees perform better if they are oriented towards doing good towards society and others.
“Public employees perform better if they are oriented towards doing good towards society and others (Andersen, Heinesen, and Pedersen 2014; Bellé 2013; Ritz 2009)”
From Leadership and motivation: a qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Ritz 2009
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049 · see citing works
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760 · see citing works
Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 · Cited by 3,311 · see citing works
The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Research.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36 · Cited by 1,265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The leadership behaviour of supervisors considerably influences the motivation and behaviour of the employees (Burns, 1978; Judge et al., 2004).”
BackgroundRelation of Leader Consideration and Initiating Structure to R and D Subordinates' Satisfaction
House, R. J., Filley, A. C., & Kerr, S. (1971) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391283 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation
SCHWARZ, G., NEWMAN, A., COOPER, B., & EVA, N. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12266 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Andersen, L. B., Bjørnholt, B., Bro, L. L., & Holm-Petersen, C. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852316654747 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“Public employees perform better if they are oriented towards doing good towards society and others (Andersen et al., 2014; Bellé, 2013; Ritz, 2009), and it is therefore highly relevant to ask how leaders can enhance their employees’ public service motivation (PSM).”
Background
- Authors
- Ritz, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Ritz, Adrian
- ORCID
- Ritz, Adrian
- Venue
- International Review of Administrative Sciences
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-78
- ISSN
- 0020-8523 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7226
- OpenAlex
- W2012151694
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Review of Administrative Sciences (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- public service motivation, organizational performance, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, New Public Management, public sector reform, federal employees, employee attitudes, goal-oriented management, perceived performance, public interest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review