Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 780

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Similarity of the Relations between Marital Status and Subjective Well-Being Across Cultures

Diener, Ed, Gohm, Carol L., Suh, Eunkook, Oishi, Shigehiro·2000·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

In a sample of 59,169 persons in 42 nations, relations between marital status and subjective well-being were found to be very similar across the world. Although cultural variables were found to alter the size of certain relations between marital status and subjective well-being, the effect sizes were very small. Specifically, in terms of life satisfaction, the benefit of marriage over cohabitation was greater in collectivist than in individualist nations. In terms of positive emotions, the benefit of being married over being divorced or separated was smaller in collectivist than in individualist nations. In addition, in terms of negative emotions, the benefit of being married over being divorced or separated was smaller in nations with a high tolerance for divorce. Finally, the relations between marital status, culture, and subjective well-being did not differ by gender. Because of the small size of the effects of the cultural variables, the authors concluded that the relations between marital status and subjective well-being are very similar across the world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022100031004001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S.
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2000-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
419-436
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2111784264
Cited by
780
References
5
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similarity of the Relations between Marital Status and Subjective Well-Being Across Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022100031004001
The paper
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the Relations between Marital Status and Subjective Well-Being Across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.