Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers and Supports Experienced by Pacific Peoples in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Mental Health Services

Fa’alogo-Lilo, Christina, Cartwright, Claire·2021·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

As with minority groups internationally, Pacific peoples in New Zealand (Pasifika) experience higher rates of mental health problems than the general population, and are less likely to access mental health services. This study investigated the barriers and supports for Pasifika accessing and using mental health services with participation of 25 Pasifika (10 service-providers, 11 ex-service-users, and 4 ex-service-users/providers) in order to gain their key informant perspectives. A Pasifika-appropriate Talanoa approach was used to guide the data-collection process and the qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Barriers included stigma among Pasifika regarding mental health problems, commitment to finding solutions within the family, and both mistrust and lack of knowledge of services. Within the services, non-Pasifika providers often lacked understanding of the collectivist cultural values and practices of Pasifika, including spiritual beliefs. They were more likely to use services if the providers were respectful of Pasifika practices and paid attention to developing relationships in a culturally appropriate way. This included involvement of the Pasifika family, when possible. Service-users often benefited from contact with Pasifika providers within mainstream services. These results support previous cross-cultural research that indicates the importance of offering evaluation and intervention services grounded in an understanding and respect for the cultural significance and meaning of mental health problems for the person, the family, and their community. While efforts are made to address these issues in New Zealand, change is slow and ongoing cultural training for service-providers along with psychoeducation for Pasifika about mental health services is strongly desirable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00220221211039885

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Agnew F., 2004, Pacific models of mental health service delivery in New Zealand (“PMMHSD”) project
  2. Anae M., 2007, Paper commissioned by Ministry of Education for ‘Is your research making a difference to Pasifika education? Symposium
  3. Ataera-Minster J., 2018, Te Kaveinga: Mental health and wellbeing of Pacific peoples. Results from the New Zealand Mental Health Monitor & Health and Lifestyles Survey
  4. Bathgate M., 1997, Mental health in New Zealand from a public health perspective, 104
  5. 10.1017/S1754470X14000233 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01635.x · DOI
  7. Chentsova-Dutton Y. E., 2019, Handbook of cultural psychology, 365
  8. 10.1007/s40615-019-00583-y · DOI
  9. Coxon E., 2002, Literature review on Pacific education issues and implications: Final report (No. 8804.00)
  10. Deverick Z., 2017, Attitudes of adults towards people with experience of mental distress: Results from the 2015 New Zealand Mental Health Monitor
  11. Durie M., 1994, Whaiora: Maori health development
  12. 10.1080/01612840500280638 · DOI
  13. Health Research Council, 2004, Guidelines on Pacific health research
  14. 10.1353/cp.2003.0032 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/10474412.2015.1012671 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/03014460.2018.1465593 · DOI
  17. Kingi-‘Ulu’ave D., 2007, Professional practice of psychology in Aotearoa New Zealand, 67
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7615-3_1 · DOI
  19. 10.5172/hesr.2012.21.3.287 · DOI
  20. Lui D., 2003, From rhetoric to reality: Proceedings of the 12th annual theMHS conference 2003, 175
  21. Malo V., 2000, Pacific people talk about their experiences with mental illness
  22. 10.1007/s11205-012-0220-8 · DOI
  23. Merriam S. B., 2002, Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 3
  24. Ministry of Health, 2019, Office of the director of mental health and addiction services: Annual report 2017
  25. Ministry for Pacific Peoples, 2016, Annual report 2016
  26. Oakley Browne M., 2006, Te Rau Hinengaro: The New Zealand mental health survey
  27. Pulotu-Endemann F. K., 2004, A Pacific perspective on the NZ mental health Classification and Outcomes Study (CAOS), a discussion paper
  28. 10.4018/978-1-5225-1874-7.ch008 · DOI
  29. Samu K. S., 2009, Pacific Health Dialog, 15, 120
  30. 10.2196/games.3804 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01468.x · DOI
  32. Sue D. W., 2019, Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice
  33. 10.1016/S1077-7229(96)80015-0 · DOI
  34. Te Pou, 2009, Real Skills Plus Seitapu
  35. Te Pou o Te Whakaaro Nui, 2010, Talking therapies for Pasifika Peoples: best and promising practice guide for mental health and addiction services
  36. Truong M., 2017, ABNF Journal, 28, 34
  37. Tukuiotonga C., 2013, Cole’s medical practice in New Zealand, 66
  38. Vaioleti T. M., 2006, Waikato Journal of Education, 12, 21
  39. Vaka S., 2009, Pacific Health Dialog, 15, 89
  40. Wendt A., 1996, Span, April–October, 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Fa’alogo-Lilo, C., & Cartwright, C.
Affiliations
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2021-09-07
Volume
52
Issue
8-9
Pages
752-770
ISSN
  • 0022-0221
  • 1552-5422
Cited by
20
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review