Cited by 20Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Application of a Machine Learning Technology in the Definition of Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Status: A Retrospective Study of 2567 Subjects Suffering from Obesity with or without Metabolic Syndrome

Open access
Masi, Davide, Risi, Renata, Biagi, Filippo, Vasquez Barahona, Daniel, Watanabe, Mikiko, Zilich, Rita, Gabrielli, Gabriele, Santin, Pierluigi +3 more·2022·Nutrients

Abstract

The key factors playing a role in the pathogenesis of metabolic alterations observed in many patients with obesity have not been fully characterized. Their identification is crucial, and it would represent a fundamental step towards better management of this urgent public health issue. This aim could be accomplished by exploiting the potential of machine learning (ML) technology. In a single-centre study (n = 2567), we used an ML analysis to cluster patients with metabolically healthy (MHO) or metabolically unhealthy (MUO) obesity, based on several clinical and biochemical variables. The first model provided by ML was able to predict the presence/absence of MHO with an accuracy of 66.67% and 72.15%, respectively, and included the following parameters: HOMA-IR, upper body fat/lower body fat, glycosylated haemoglobin, red blood cells, age, alanine aminotransferase, uric acid, white blood cells, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and gamma-glutamyl transferase. For each of these parameters, ML provided threshold values identifying either MUO or MHO. A second model including IGF-1 zSDS, a surrogate marker of IGF-1 normalized by age and sex, was even more accurate with a 71.84% and 72.3% precision, respectively. Our results demonstrated high IGF-1 levels in MHO patients, thus highlighting a possible role of IGF-1 as a novel metabolic health parameter to effectively predict the development of MUO using ML technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu14020373

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML methods have increasingly been applied to MetS prediction based on clinical and biochemical data, with encouraging outcomes across various populations.

    “In recent years, ML methods have increasingly been applied to MetS prediction based on clinical and biochemical data, with encouraging outcomes across various populations [46–50].”

    From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Methods (§2.3) and Results (§3.2) describe an ML model using clinical and biochemical variables to distinguish metabolically healthy from unhealthy obesity, with predictive precision of roughly 67–72%. This supports an example of encouraging ML results related to metabolic syndrome, but the study examines one cohort of patients with obesity, not outcomes across various populations or prospective prediction of MetS. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masi, D., Risi, R., Biagi, F., Vasquez Barahona, D., Watanabe, M., Zilich, R., Gabrielli, G., Santin, P., Mariani, S., Lubrano, C., & Gnessi, L.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
  • Mix-x Partner, 20153 Milano, Italy
  • Rulex Inc., 16122 Genova, Italy
  • Deimos Engineering, 33100 Udine, Italy
Corresponding author
Masi, Davide
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-15
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
373
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205547543
Cited by
20
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
metabolically healthy obesity, metabolically unhealthy obesity, metabolic syndrome, obesity, insulin-like growth factor I, HOMA-IR, machine learning clustering, insulin resistance, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, glycosylated haemoglobin
MeSH terms
Obesity, Metabolically Benign, Machine Learning, Adipose Tissue, Adult, Alanine Transaminase, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Health Status, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Absorptiometry, Photon, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review