The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Kingdom Cell-to-Cell Interactions in Cariogenic Biofilm Initiation
Abstract
Candida albicans is known to form polymicrobial biofilms with various Streptococcus spp., including mitis and mutans group streptococci. Streptococcus gordonii (mitis group) has been shown to bind avidly to C. albicans hyphae via direct cell-to-cell interaction, while the cariogenic pathogen Streptococcus mutans (mutans group) interacts with the fungal cells via extracellular glucans. However, the biophysical properties of these cross-kingdom interactions at the single-cell level during the early stage of biofilm formation remain understudied. Here, we examined the binding forces between S. mutans (or S. gordonii) and C. albicans in the presence and absence of in situ glucans on the fungal surface using single-cell atomic force microscopy and their influence on biofilm initiation and subsequent development under cariogenic conditions. The data show that S. gordonii binding force to the C. albicans surface is significantly higher than that of S. mutans to the fungal surface (~2-fold). However, S. mutans binding forces are dramatically enhanced when the C. albicans cell surface is locally coated with extracellular glucans (~6-fold vs. uncoated C. albicans), which vastly exceeds the forces between S. gordonii and C. albicans. The enhanced binding affinity of S. mutans to glucan-coated C. albicans resulted in a larger structure during early biofilm initiation compared to S. gordonii–C. albicans biofilms. Ultimately, this resulted in S. mutans dominance composition in the 3-species biofilm model under cariogenic conditions. This study provides a novel biophysical aspect of Candida-streptococcal interaction whereby extracellular glucans may selectively favor S. mutans binding interactions with C. albicans during cariogenic biofilm development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under sugar exposure, cariogenic species reduce the biological diversity of the dental biofilm and outcompete oral eubiota like S. gordonii, S. sanguinis, and S. oralis.
“Under sugar exposure, these cariogenic species reduce the biological diversity of the dental biofilm and outcompete oral eubiota like the oral commensal streptococci Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Streptococcus oralis (8).”
From Fluoride export is required for the competitive fitness of pathogenic microorganisms in dental biofilm models (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals
Ghannoum, M. A., Jurevic, R. J., Mukherjee, P. K., Cui, F., Sikaroodi, M., Naqvi, A., & Gillevet, P. M. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000713 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 1×
“Candida albicans is a commonly detected fungal organism in the oral cavity (Ghannoum et al. 2010; Peleg et al. 2010; Koo et al. 2018).”
BackgroundCandida albicans Biofilms and Human Disease
Nobile, C. J., & Johnson, A. D. (2015) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104330 · Cited by 1,057
Streptococcus Adherence and Colonization
Nobbs, A. H., Lamont, R. J., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00014-09 · Cited by 657
Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions
Peleg, A. Y., Hogan, D. A., & Mylonakis, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2313 · Cited by 619
Hwang, G., Liu, Y., Kim, D., Li, Y., Krysan, D. J., & Koo, H. (2017) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006407 · Cited by 214
Self-citationNobbs, A. H., Vickerman, M. M., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2010) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00103-10 · Cited by 112
Streptococcus gordonii comCDE (competence) operon modulates biofilm formation with Candida albicans
Jack, A. A., Daniels, D. E., Jepson, M. A., Vickerman, M. M., Lamont, R. J., Jenkinson, H. F., & Nobbs, A. H. (2015) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.000010 · Cited by 88
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0042-2018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1099/mic.0.083378-0 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00438-09 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/154411130301400203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/mBio.01363-14 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00087-14 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2009.65 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.05203-11 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.030999 · DOI
- 10.1159/000479091 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1143970 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034515592859 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0113-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007342 · DOI
- 10.2217/fmb.14.92 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00276-08 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00686 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.181 · DOI
- O’Donnell LE, 2015, FEMS Yeast Res, 15
- 10.1039/c2sm25100k · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15165-4 · DOI
- 10.1099/mic.0.062109-0 · DOI
- 10.3402/jom.v6.23419. · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00685-10 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41396-020-0608-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/omi.12049 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0151908 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Che, J., Shi, J., Fang, C., Zeng, X., Wu, Z., Du, Q., Tu, M., & Pan, D. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040704 · Cited by 52
Is Candida albicans a contributor to cancer? A critical review based on the current evidence
Wang, X., Zhang, W., Wu, W., Wu, S., Young, A., & Yan, Z. (2023) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2023.127370 · Cited by 44
A Roadmap towards Precision Periodontics
Rakic, M., Pejcic, N., Perunovic, N., & Vojvodic, D. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57030233 · Cited by 36
Banerjee, A., Kang, C.-Y., An, M., Koff, B. B., Sunder, S., Kumar, A., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00184-24 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, S. X., Tian, J., Liu, Y., Dhall, A., Koo, H., & Hwang, G.
- Affiliations
- Biofilm Research Labs, Levy Center for Oral Health, Department of Orthodontics, Divisions of Pediatric Dentistry and Community Oral Health, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-08-27
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-81
- ISSN
- 0022-0345
- 1544-0591
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review