The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective regulation and the future of work in the digital economy: Insights from comparative employment relations
Abstract
The impact of technological change on employment, inequality and job quality has attracted considerable analysis from both scholars and practitioners. However, less attention has been paid to how digital technologies are changing contemporary workplaces and how workers are responding to these changes. This article reviews recent research from the multidisciplinary comparative employment relations field, with a focus on institutional resilience or change associated with digitalization; and the strategic responses of unions and other worker representatives to these trends. We find that the insights of economists, sociologists and employment relations scholars are complementary, as each addresses a different dimension of technological change and associated worker outcomes. Comparative employment relations researchers are more likely to influence current debates where they both articulate the unique contribution of their multi-method and comparative research methods and aggregate findings beyond single or paired industry and national case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The choice of strategies has been shown to be strongly influenced by the regulatory context (Doellgast & Wagner, 2022;Krzywdzinski, Pfeiffer, et al., 2022;Thompson & Laaser, 2021).”
From Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management (2025) · cites this paper as Doellgast & Wagner, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870 · cited 1×
“The starting point in economics is theories of ‘skill-biased technological change’, which originally described the ability of computer technologies to increase the productivity of and demand for higher-skilled relative to lower-skilled workers (Berman et al., 1994).”
New Technology, Work and Employment
(2010) · doi:10.1111/(issn)1468-005x · Cited by 135
Research works printed but not linked: 88
- Abilio LC, 2021, Journal of Labor and Society, 1, 1
- 10.1093/ser/mwab020 · DOI
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7551/mitpress/14109.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781139088381 · DOI
- Baldwin R, 2019, The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work
- 10.1177/0959680112452691 · DOI
- 10.21114/rel.2019.02.05 · DOI
- 10.34157/9783648124758 · DOI
- 10.1177/09596801211004268 · DOI
- 10.1177/1024258920918480 · DOI
- Brynjolfsson E, 2014, The Second Machine age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
- 10.1177/1024529420918160 · DOI
- 10.1093/ser/mwz012 · DOI
- 10.1177/09596801211052531 · DOI
- De Stefano V, 2019, Comparitive Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41, 15
- 10.1177/1461444819891613 · DOI
- Dettmer A, 2021, Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 1
- 10.1177/00323292211006563 · DOI
- Doellgast V, 2022, Exit, Voice, and Solidarity: Contesting Precarity in US and European Telecommunications Firms
- 10.1111/ntwe.12067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2139/ssrn.3631602 · DOI
- 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.13.2.0037 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122414548194 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12339 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230105.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7202/1074565ar · DOI
- 10.7202/1074564ar · DOI
- Gegenhuber T, 2020, Human Resource Management Journal, 31, 259
- 10.1177/1024258916687250 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0022185620913129 · DOI
- Haidar J, 2021, Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism, 10.4337/9781802205138 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12141 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12291 · DOI
- 10.1093/0199247757.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10301763.2017.1397258 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjir.12439 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.3377771 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1024258917702274 · DOI
- Ilsøe A, 2021, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 0143831X2110569
- Jesnes K, 2019, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 53
- 10.6027/temanord2020-513 · DOI
- Joyce S, 2021, A Modern Guide to Labour and the Platform Economy, 177
- 10.1111/ntwe.12100 · DOI
- Lehndorff S, 2009, European Employment Models in Flux. A Comparison of Institutional Change in Nine European Countries, 105
- Lei YW, 2021, Work, Employment and Society
- 10.1177/001979391106400502 · DOI
- 10.1086/714292 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12149 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/irj.12323 · DOI
- 10.1177/10957960211035082 · DOI
- MacKenzie D, 1999, The Social Shaping of Technology
- Marenco M, 2021, European Political Science Review, 1
- 10.22325/fes/res.2021.68 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv16zjhcj.15 · DOI
- 10.1093/ser/mwx022 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv28vb1tp.9 · DOI
- 10.1177/0896920520949631 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv28vb1tp.10 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315561523 · DOI
- Neufeind M, 2018, Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
- 10.2139/ssrn.3789992 · DOI
- 10.3390/soc6020016 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12315 · DOI
- 10.1177/0019793921989683 · DOI
- 10.1177/0143831X211054177 · DOI
- 10.1093/ser/mwx062 · DOI
- Rothstein SA, 2021, British Journal of Industrial Relations
- 10.7202/1074563ar · DOI
- Shalini Bathini DR, 2021, New Technology, Work and Employment
- Soskice D, 2020, Stato e mercato, 40, 17
- 10.1177/0950017016645716 · DOI
- 10.7202/1074562ar · DOI
- Susskind D, 2020, A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond
- 10.1177/0950017019862954 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1537592718001081 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5129/001041519X15647434969821 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-923X.12787 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4337/9781802205138.00019 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017019836911 · DOI · Paper page
- West DM, 2018, The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation
- 10.1093/ser/mwab016 · DOI
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Zuboff S, 2019, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power
- 10.1177/0042098020951421 · DOI
Cited by
Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management
Krzywdzinski, M., Schneiß, D., & Sperling, A. (2025) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12293 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Doellgast, V., & Wagner, I.
- Affiliations
- ILR School, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Institute for Social Research, Oslo, Norway
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-05-18
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-460
- ISSN
- 0022-1856
- 1472-9296
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective regulation and the future of work in the digital economy: Insights from comparative employment relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00221856221101165
- The paper
- Doellgast, V., & Wagner, I. (2022). Collective regulation and the future of work in the digital economy: Insights from comparative employment relations. Journal of Industrial Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221101165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.