Cited by 53Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Magnitude representation and working memory updating in children with arithmetic and reading comprehension disabilities

Pelegrina, Santiago, Capodieci, Agnese, Carretti, Barbara, Cornoldi, Cesare·2015·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

It has been argued that children with learning disabilities (LD) encounter severe problems in working memory (WM) tasks, especially when they need to update information stored in their WM. It is not clear, however, to what extent this is due to a generally poor updating ability or to a difficulty specific to the domain to be processed. To examine this issue, two groups of children with arithmetic or reading comprehension LD and a group of typically developing children (9 to 10 years old) were assessed using two updating tasks requiring to select the smallest numbers or objects presented. The results showed that children with an arithmetic disability failed in a number updating task, but not in the object updating task. The opposite was true for the group with poor reading comprehension, whose performance was worse in the object than in the number updating task. It may be concluded that the problem of WM updating in children with LD is also due to a poor representation of the material to be updated. In addition, our findings suggest that the mental representation of the size of objects relates to the semantic representation of the objects' properties and differs from the quantitative representation of numbers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219414527480

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelegrina, S., Capodieci, A., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Jaén (ES)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Carretti, Barbara
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2014-03-31
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
658-668
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2114746319
Cited by
53
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
working memory updating, magnitude representation, arithmetic learning disabilities, domain specificity, semantic representation, quantitative representation, children
MeSH terms
Child, Dyslexia, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Comprehension, Dyscalculia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review