Cited by 267Reading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension

Open access
Palladino, Paola, Cornoldi, Cesare, De Beni, Rossana, Pazzaglia, Francesca·2001·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

In this study, we examine the relation between reading comprehension ability and success in working memory updating tasks. Groups of poor and good comprehenders, matched for logical reasoning ability, but different in reading comprehension ability, were administered various updating tasks in a series of experiments. In the first experiment, the participants were presented with lists of words, the length of which (4-10 words) was unknown beforehand, and were required to remember the last 4 words in each series. In this task, we found a decrease in performance that was related to longer series and poor reading ability. In the second experiment, we presented lists of nouns referring to items of different sizes, in a task that simulated the selection and updating of relevant information that occurs in the on-line comprehension process. The participants were required to remember a limited, predefined number of the smallest items presented. We found that poor comprehenders not only had a poorer memory, but also made a greater number of intrusion errors. In the third and fourth experiments, memory load (number of items to be selected) and suppression request (number of potentially relevant items) were manipulated within subjects. Increases in both memory load and suppression requests impaired performance. Furthermore, we found that poor comprehenders produced a greater number of intrusion errors, particularly when the suppression request was increased. Finally, in a fifth experiment, a request to specify the size of presented items was introduced. Poor comprehenders were able to select the appropriate items, although their recall was poorer. Altogether, the data show that working memory abilities, based on selecting and updating relevant information and avoiding intrusion errors, are related to reading comprehension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03194929

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psy- chological Review, 99, 440-466.
  2. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse com- prehension. New York: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Cornoldi, Cesare
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
2001-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
344-354
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W1983577160
Cited by
267
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
reading comprehension, working memory, intrusion errors, memory load, selective attention, poor comprehenders, logical reasoning
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Reading, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review