Cited by 185Reading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders

Carretti, Barbara, Cornoldi, Cesare, De Beni, Rossana, Romanò, Marta·2005·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

In this research, we examined the relation between reading comprehension and success in a working memory updating task. We tested the hypotheses that poor comprehenders' deficiencies are associated with a specific difficulty in the working memory updating process, particularly in controlling for information that is no longer relevant. In the first experiment, groups of poor and good comprehenders, ages 8-11 years, were administered a working memory updating task. In the second experiment a year later, a subgroup of participants involved in the first experiment was tested with a different updating task. In both experiments, poor comprehenders had less accurate recall performance and made more intrusion errors than did good comprehenders. Moreover, distinguishing intrusion errors on the basis of their permanence in memory, we found that poor comprehenders were more likely to intrude items that were maintained longer in memory than were good comprehenders. This type of error predicted reading comprehension abilities better than did working memory recall. This suggests that the relation between reading comprehension and working memory is mediated by the ability to control for irrelevant information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Carretti, Barbara
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
45-66
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069705154
Cited by
185
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory updating, reading comprehension, poor comprehenders, intrusion errors, recall accuracy, children, mediation
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reading, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review