Cited by 152Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The Efficacy of Stimulant Drug Treatment for Hyperactivity: A Meta-Analysis

Kavale, Kenneth·1982·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

This investigation reviews 135 studies examining the efficacy of stimulant drug treatment for hyperactivity. Meta-analysis, the analysis of analyses, is the methodological procedure used to integrate research findings. General findings indicate positive effects for drug intervention. In addition, subsets of data illustrating important behavioral, cognitive, and physiological outcomes were examined. Finally, variation among studies in terms of study features, subject characteristics, and design variables were investigated. Findings were compared and comrasted with previous reviews and showed that the extant literature provides a basis for concluding that stimulant drugs are an effective treatment for hyperactivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221948201500508

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy study of lisdexamfetamine, Childress et al. reported a significant improvement in emotional lability in LDEX-treated children with ADHD and high levels of emotional lability.

    “More recently, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy study of lisdexamfetamine (LDEX), Childress et al [40] reported a significant improvement in emotional lability in the LDEX-treated children with ADHD and high levels of emotional lability.”

    From Using Stimulants to Treat ADHD-Related Emotional Lability (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavale, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Kavale, Kenneth
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
1982-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
280-289
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2147147287
Cited by
152
References
2
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
stimulants, hyperactivity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, drug efficacy, drug treatment outcomes, cognitive outcomes, physiological outcomes
MeSH terms
Achievement, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Blood Pressure, Body Height, Body Weight, Child, Child Behavior, Dextroamphetamine, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Methylphenidate, Motor Activity, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Stimulation, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review