CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 272Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short-Term Memory and Working Memory: Do Both Contribute to Our Understanding of Academic Achievement in Children and Adults with Learning Disabilities?

Swanson, H. Lee·1994·Journal of Learning Disabilities
DOI 10.1177/002221949402700107
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Seventy-five children and adults with learning disabilities (age range = 5.0 to 42.10 yrs.) and 86 normally achieving children and adults (age range = 5.11 to 58.0 yrs.) were compared on short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WM) tasks to assess the relationship between STM and WM, and to test whether these measures independently relate to achievement. For both ability groups, the factor analyses indicated that STM and WM loaded on different factors, and the regressions and partial correlations showed that these different factors accounted for separate variance in reading comprehension and mathematics. Both STM and WM are important in understanding reading comprehension and mathematics performance in children and adults with learning disabilities; however, WM is more important for children and adults without learning disabilities. In contrast to WM, STM contributed minimal variance to word recognition in both ability groups. Overall, it was concluded that STM and WM do reflect different processes, both of which seem to separate the two ability groups. However, models of memory that view STM and WM as interchangeable, or STM in isolation, do not provide an adequate framework for capturing academic performance in children and adults with learning disabilities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221949402700107

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Baddeley, A. D., 1986, Working memory.
  2. Baddeley, A. D., 1985, Everyday memory actions and absentmindedness, 1
  3. Dunn, L., 1981, Peabody picture vocabulary test-Revised.
  4. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1128 · DOI
  5. Hammill, D., 1985, Detroit test of learning aptitude
  6. Hulme, C., 1992, Working memory and severe learning difficulties—Essays in cognitive psychology.
  7. Joreskog, K. G., 1984, LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood.
  8. Kaufman, A., 1983, Kaufman assessment battery for children (K-ABC) interpretive manual.
  9. Maracuilo, L., 1983, Multivariate statistics in the social sciences.
  10. Masson, M. E. J., 1983, Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 214
  11. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.424 · DOI
  12. Schneider, W., 1987, The psychology of learning and motivations, 53
  13. Swanson, H. L., Mental processing potential test.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 272

Related

Metadata

Authors
Swanson, H. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, H. Lee
ORCID
Swanson, H. Lee
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1994-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
34-50
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
DOI
10.1177/002221949402700107
OpenAlex
W2157670160
Cited by
272
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
short-term memory, working memory, learning disabilities, reading comprehension, mathematics achievement, word recognition, academic performance, children and adults, memory models
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language, Learning Disabilities, Male, Memory, Reading, Semantics, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review