Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure

Cooper, R.G.·1979·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

This article reports the results of Project NewProd, an extensive investigation into what separates successful from unsuccessful new industrial products. Multivariate methods are used to probe this success/failure question. The dimensions underlying success and failure are identified. The dominant role of product strategy and the need for a strong market orientation clearly are demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224297904300310

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,121

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, R. G.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
1979-06
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
93-103
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2094914926
Cited by
1,121
References
1
FWCI
38.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224297904300310
The paper
Cooper, R. G. (1979). The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297904300310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.