Cited by 2,905Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyCustomer churn and segmentationService and Product Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study

Keaveney, Susan M.·1995·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Customer switching behavior damages market share and profitability of service firms yet has remained virtually unexplored in the marketing literature. The author reports results of a critical incident study conducted among more than 500 service customers. The research identifies more than 800 critical behaviors of service firms that caused customers to switch services. Customers’ reasons for switching services were classified into eight general categories. The author then discusses implications for further model development and offers recommendations for managers of service firms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224299505900206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Service targets can be classified as core system features or staff-level customer service events.

    “Broadly, these service targets can be either core system type features (e.g.hotel room poorly designed / maintained /cleaned) or more staff level customer service events (Hoffman & Bateson, 2006;Keaveney, 1995).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 2,905

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Berry Leonard L., 1980, Business, 30, 24
  2. 10.1177/002224299005400206 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/002224299005400105 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/002224299405800408 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0061470 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Glaser Barney, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory.
  7. Hart Christopher W.L., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 148
  8. Holsti Ole R., 1968, The Handbook of Social Psychology: Research Methods, 2, 596
  9. Hunt Shelby D., 1983, Marketing Theory.
  10. 10.1177/002224379303000107 · DOI
  11. Marketing Science Institute, 1992, Research Priorities 1992–1994: A Guide to MSI Research Programs and Procedures.
  12. Nyquist Jody D., 1987, Add Value to Your Service, 13
  13. Reichheld Frederick F., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 68, 105
  14. Ronan William W., 1974, Studies in Personnel Psychology, 6, 53
  15. Sasser W. Earl, 1976, Harvard Business Review, 54, 133
  16. Shostack Lynn, 1984, Harvard Business Review, 62, 133

Metadata

Authors
Keaveney, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Keaveney, Susan M.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
1995-04
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
71-82
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2047562908
Cited by
2,905
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 173 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 156 · 2012: 166
FWCI
32.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
customer switching, service sector, service companies, customer churn, service quality, consumer behavior, service marketing management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review