Cited by 21Customer churn and segmentationDigital Marketing and Social MediaAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI for Customer Journeys: A Transformer Approach

Open access
Lu, Zipei, Kannan, P.K.·2026·Journal of Marketing Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

When analyzing a sequence of customer interactions, it is important for firms to understand how these interactions align with key objectives, such as generating qualified customer leads, driving conversion events, or reducing churn. The authors introduce a transformer-based framework that models customer interactions in a sequence similar to how a sentence is modeled as a sequence of words by large language models. They propose a heterogeneous-mixture multihead self-attention mechanism that captures individual heterogeneity in touchpoint effects. The model identifies self-attention patterns that reflect both population-level trends and the unique relationships between touchpoints within each customer journey. By assigning varying weights to each attention head, the model accounts for the distinctive aspects of the journey of each user. This results in more accurate predictions, enabling precise targeting and outperforming existing approaches such as hidden Markov models, point process models, and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. This empirical application in a multichannel marketing context demonstrates how managers can leverage the model's features to identify high-potential customers for targeting. Extensive simulations further establish the model's superiority over competing approaches. Beyond multichannel marketing, the transformer-based model also has broad applicability in customer journeys across other domains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00222437251347268

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.2139/ssrn.2158421 · DOI
  2. 10.2139/ssrn.4781850 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/00222429241276529 · DOI
  4. 10.2139/ssrn.4395751 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.02.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1023/A:1007379606734 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/11731139_89 · DOI
  8. Crawshaw Michael (2020) “Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey ” arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09796. · arXiv
  9. Dai Zihang Yang Zhilin Yang Yiming Carbonell Jaime Le Quoc V. Salakhutdinov Ruslan (2019) “Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context ” arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02860. · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0022243718802845 · DOI
  11. Dang Chu (Ivy), Ursu Raluca, Chintagunta Pradeep K. (2020), “Search Revisits,” SSRN, https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3626451.
  12. 10.1177/002224379903600401 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/14413582231222311 · DOI
  14. 10.1287/mksc.2017.1050 · DOI
  15. 10.3982/ECTA16901 · DOI
  16. 10.2139/ssrn.4335141 · DOI
  17. Goić Marcel, Jerath Kinshuk, Kalyanam Kirthi (2021), “The Roles of Multiple Channels in Predicting Website Visits and Purchases: Engagers Versus Closers,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39 (3), 69–96.
  18. Gordon Mitchell A. Duh Kevin Andrews Nicholas (2020) “Compressing BERT: Studying the Effects of Weight Pruning on Transfer Learning ” arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08307. · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/00222429231224748 · DOI
  20. Kingma Diederik P. Ba Jimmy (2014) “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization ” arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. · arXiv
  21. 10.1509/jm.15.0420 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1509/jmr.13.0050 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0022243720954376 · DOI
  24. 10.1509/jmkr.41.4.467.47005 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/002224379703400205 · DOI
  26. Michel Paul, Levy Omer, Neubig Graham (2019), “Are Sixteen Heads Really Better Than one?” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Associateion for Computing Machinery.
  27. 10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_03 · DOI
  28. 10.1287/mksc.1070.0294 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/15344843231198361 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00227 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4914 · DOI
  32. Sundararajan Mukund Taly Ankur Yan Qiqi (2017) “Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks ” arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01365. · arXiv
  33. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.02.007 · DOI
  34. Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Łukasz, Polosukhin Illia (2017), “Attention Is All You Need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17. Association for Computing Machinery, 6000–10.
  35. 10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9590 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2451 · DOI
  37. 10.1145/3292500.3330753 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Z., & Kannan, P. K.
Corresponding author
Kannan, P.K.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2025-09-25
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W4410586026
Cited by
21
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 3
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Amazon Research Awards (23073850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
customer journey, transformer models, self-attention, multi-head self-attention, customer targeting, multichannel marketing, customer churn, conversion prediction, consumer heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review