The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Affective Reactions on Attitudes toward the Advertisement and the Brand: A Step toward Ecological Validity
Abstract
The author investigates the impact of affective reactions elicited by television advertisements on two variables of major interest in advertising: attitude toward the advertisement (Aad) and postexposure brand attitude (A bp). Previous research has suffered from using non-natural settings, verbal measures of affect, and unknown brands. The author's study avoids forced exposure, uses a real program in which real commercials for unknown and known brands were embedded, and interviews subjects after they have viewed all the commercials. Thus, it offers a more natural setting in which to examine whether previously established relations between affective reactions and Aad and attitude toward the brand (A b) still hold. The author measures affective reactions through facial expressions, as well as classical verbal measures, and finds that the contribution of affective responses to Aad and A bp is evident for verbal, but not facial, measures of affect. The impact of affective responses varies in a theoretically predictable way across familiar and unfamiliar brands, with the latter being more influenced by verbal affective reactions generated by the advertisement. The author presents several explanations for the results and offers issues for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150973 · Cited by 1,472
Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising.
Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209063 · Cited by 1,076
Cited by
The Effects of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents1
Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148760 · Cited by 1,374
The marketing advantages of strong brands
Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2003) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540139 · Cited by 607
How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.944401 · Cited by 447
It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion
Peck, J., & Wiggins, J. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.056 · Cited by 397
Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise – a pilot investigation
Derbaix, C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(02)00157-5 · Cited by 321
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Derbaix, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-479
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2316503402
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Affective Reactions on Attitudes toward the Advertisement and the Brand: A Step toward Ecological Validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224379503200409
- The paper
- Derbaix, C. M. (1995). The Impact of Affective Reactions on Attitudes toward the Advertisement and the Brand: A Step toward Ecological Validity. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379503200409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.