The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries
Abstract
The authors extend previous research by examining antecedents and consequences of the market intelligence dissemination process across functional boundaries. Their study, involving 788 nonmarketing managers in high-tech equipment manufacturing companies, suggests that both dissemination frequency and formality have nonlinear effects on perceived intelligence quality. In addition, they find evidence of a mere formality effect; that is, intelligence received through formal channels appears to be used more than that obtained through informal channels. The authors also find that the frequency with which market intelligence is disseminated is related to interfunctional distance, joint customer visits, senders’ positional power, a receiver's organizational commitment, and trust in a sender. Additionally they find the formality of the dissemination process is shaped by interfunctional distance, receivers’ trust in senders, and structural flux. Interestingly, the effects of internal environmental volatility (i.e., structural flux) appear to be different from those of external environmental volatility (i.e., market dynamism). For example, structural flux is found to affect dissemination formality, but not frequency, whereas the opposite is true for market dynamism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Cited by
Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence within the Firm
Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.14 · Cited by 587
LOGISTICS INNOVATION: A CUSTOMER VALUE-ORIENTED SOCIAL PROCESS
Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2005) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00196.x · Cited by 458
Instituting the Marketing Concept in a Multinational Setting: The Role of National Culture
Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/03079459994623 · Cited by 265
Van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R. K. (1998) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.11.s1 · Cited by 252
Grayson, K., Johnson, D., & Chen, D.-F. R. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.2.241 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-61
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2089267254
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224379603300105
- The paper
- Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. (1996). Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.