The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders
Abstract
Scholars for a long time theorized about the role of political leaders, but empirical research has been limited by the lack of systematic data about individual leaders. Archigos is a new dataset with information on leaders in 188 countries from 1875 to 2004. We provide an overview of the main features of this data. Archigos specifically identifies the effective leaders of each independent state; it codes when and how leaders came into power, their age, and their gender, as well as their personal fate one year after they lost office. We illustrate the utility of the Archigos dataset by demonstrating how leader attributes predict other features of interest in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Crisis interactions differ depending on whether leaders face each other for the first time or have had prior interactions. Irregular leader changes can help identify political change in autocracies not apparent from data that consider only the democratic nature of institutions. Finally, transitions to democracy in the third wave are more likely to fail in instances where autocratic rulers were punished after leaving office. Our examples illustrate new empirical findings that simply could not be explored in existing data sources. Although selective, our overview demonstrates how Archigos bears considerable promise in providing answers to new and old research questions and opens up new avenues for research on individual leaders as decisionmakers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Logic of Political Survival
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4292.001.0001 · Cited by 4,217 · cited 3×
“…applied to decisions such as conflict initiation and continuation (Fearon, 1994; Downs & Rocke, 1994; Leeds & Davis, 1997; Schultz, 2001b; Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Colaresi, 2004; Mansfield & Snyder, 2005; Horowitz, McDermott & Stam, 2005; Lai & Slater, 2006), impose or comply with…”
BackgroundDemocracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804946 · Cited by 2,845
Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War
Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2660.001.0001 · Cited by 457
(2008) · Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9780203938560-23 · Cited by 198
Cited by
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714000851 · Cited by 1,537
Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset
Powell, J. M., & Thyne, C. L. (2011) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343310397436 · Cited by 836
Going to extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870–2014
Funke, M., Schularick, M., & Trebesch, C. (2016) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006 · Cited by 616
Frantz, E., & Kendall-Taylor, A. (2014) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343313519808 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-283
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W1995964689
- Cited by
- 1,128
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 122.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022343308100719
- The paper
- Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308100719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.