Cited by 267Political Conflict and GovernanceTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolencePeacebuilding and International Security

Organized violence 1989–2022, and the return of conflict between states

Open access
Davies, Shawn, Pettersson, Therése, Öberg, Magnus·2023·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

This article reports on trends in organized violence, building on new data from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP). In 2022, fatalities from organized violence increased by a staggering 97%, compared to the previous year, from 120,000 in 2021 to 237,000 in 2022, making 2022 the deadliest year since the Rwandan genocide in 1994. The increase was driven by two, particularly deadly, state-based armed conflicts: the Russia–Ukraine war, and the war in Ethiopia against TPLF (Tigray People’s Liberation Front). With more than 81,500 and 101,000 fatalities respectively, these are the two most deadly state-based conflict-years recorded in the post-1989 period. The Russian invasion of Ukraine is the first large-scale interstate war in 20 years, and the first interstate armed conflict since World War II where a major power in the international system seeks both territorial gains for itself and the subjugation of another state through regime change. We have witnessed an emerging trend of increased conflict between states in the last decade, including cases where major powers support opposite sides in internationalized intrastate conflict. UCDP recorded 55 active state-based armed conflicts in 2022, an increase of one compared to the previous year. Eight of these conflicts reached the level of war. While the fatalities caused by non-state conflict decreased somewhat when compared to 2021, the number of non-state conflicts, as well as both the number of civilians killed in one-sided violence and the number of actors carrying out such violence, increased in 2022.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00223433231185169

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In subsequent years, Malawi, Rwanda, and South Sudan enacted cybercrime or cybersecurity laws penalizing dissemination of 'offensive' or 'false' information.

    “In subsequent years, Malawi, Rwanda, and South Sudan also enacted cybercrime or cybersecurity laws penalizing the dissemination of “offensive” or “false” information.108”

    From Legalizing control: the rise of restrictive internet regulation in sub-Saharan Africa (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    The paper’s State-based armed conflict section discusses conflict trends, while its Replication data lists armed conflicts involving the named countries (page numbers unavailable). Searches for cybercrime, cybersecurity laws, and penalties for disseminating offensive or false information found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brands, Hal & John Lewis Gaddis (2021) The new cold war: America, China, and the echoes of history. Foreign Affairs 100(6): 10-21.
  2. Economy, Elizabeth C (2014) China's imperial president: Xi Jinping tightens his grip. Foreign Affairs 93(6): 80-91.
  3. Kotkin, Stephen (2022) The cold war never ended: Ukraine, the China challenge, and the revival of the West. Foreign Affairs 101(3), 64-79.
  4. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Abidjan, Co ˆte d'Ivoire (https://www.kas.de/documents/261825/ 16928652/TheþjihadistþthreatþinþnorthernþGhanaþ andþTogo.pdf/). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2023) El Salvador state of emergency. 28 March (https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-briefing-notes/ 2023/03/el-salvador-state-emergency).
  5. SIPRI (2022) SIPRI Year Book 2022: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, S., Pettersson, T., & Öberg, M.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Pettersson, Therése
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2023-07-01
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
691-708
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W4384130853
Cited by
266
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 13
FWCI
115.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
Keywords
organized violence, interstate war, Russian invasion of Ukraine, Tigray People's Liberation Front, Ethiopia, conflict fatalities, civilian casualties, regime change, Uppsala Conflict Data Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review