Cited by 124Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The Social and Developmental Antecedents of Legal Cynicism

Open access
Nivette, Amy E., Eisner, Manuel, Malti, Tina, Ribeaud, Denis·2015·Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the social and developmental antecedents of legal cynicism. This study comprises a range of indicators organized into four domains—bonds to institutions, predispositions, experiences, and delinquent involvement—that bear on theoretically plausible mechanisms involved in the development of legal cynicism. Methods: This study examines four pathways to legal cynicism using data from two waves of the Zurich Project on the Social Development of Children and Youths ( N = 1,226). Ordinary least squares (OLS) procedures are used to regress legal cynicism at t 2 (age 15) on social and psychological characteristics measured at t 1 (age 13), and retrospective variables measured at t 2 . Baseline legal cynicism was included as a covariate in all models. Results: The results show that self-reported delinquency is the strongest predictor of legal cynicism. There is also evidence that alienation from society, negative experiences with police, and association with deviant peers can foster legal cynicism. Conclusions: This study shows that legal cynicism is to a small extent the result of alienation from social institutions and negative experiences with the police. To a much larger degree, legal cynicism seems to represent a cognitive neutralization technique used to justify one’s previous self-reported delinquency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022427814557038

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nivette, A. E., Eisner, M., Malti, T., & Ribeaud, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Nivette, Amy E.
Venue
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
270-298
ISSN
  • 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-731X
OpenAlex
W2091629214
Cited by
124
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
22.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
legal cynicism, juvenile delinquency, deviant peer affiliation, neutralization techniques, social development (developmental psychology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review