Cited by 44Behavioral and Psychological StudiesReading and Literacy DevelopmentEducational Assessment and Improvement

The Effects of Curriculum on the Sensitivity of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading

Hintze, John M., Shapiro, Edward S., Lutz, J. Gary·1994·The Journal of Special Education

Abstract

This study examined the effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of repeated curriculum-based measurement (CBM). Participants included 24 third-grade students who were instructed primarily in a literature-based Scott, Foresman basal series, and 24 third-grade students who were instructed primarily in a more traditional basal series. CBM passage probes from each basal reading series were administered to all students twice weekly over a 9-week period. Each student's rate of progress in each reading series was indexed using an ordinary least squares regression to determine the slope of the data series. Results suggested that passage probes selected from the literature-based basal series were less sensitive to indexing growth over time than those from the traditional basal series.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002246699402800205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., & Lutz, J. G.
Affiliations
Lehigh University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Special Education
Published
1994-07
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
188-202
ISSN
  • 0022-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4764
OpenAlex
W2156367017
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Special Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
curriculum-based measurement, reading assessment, test sensitivity, basal reading series, growth rate, third grade, reading instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review