Cited by 64Reading and Literacy DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEducational Assessment and Improvement

An Investigation of the Effects of Passage Difficulty Level on Outcomes of Oral Reading Fluency Progress Monitoring

Hintze, John M., Daly, Edward J., Shapiro, Edward S.·1998·School Psychology Review

Abstract

This study examined the differential effects of using grade versus goal level reading material on curriculum-based measurement (CBM) progress-monitoring procedures. Participants included a total of 80 students, 20 each from grades 1 through 4. CBM reading passage probes from both grade and goal level material were administered to all students, twice weekly during an 11-week period. Students' rate of progress in each level of materials was indexed using the slope of their data series calculated by ordinary least-squares regression. Results indicate that the amount of progress observed (i.e., slope of improvement) varied as a function of grade and whether student progress was monitored in grade or goal level material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085928

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The consistent finding in G-theory studies is that raters are rarely influential whereas tasks are nearly always influential.

    “These three facets are most typically studied in G-theory; however, the consistent finding is that raters are rarely influential whereas tasks are nearly always influential [81].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hintze, J. M., Daly, E. J., & Shapiro, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Corresponding author
Hintze, John M.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
433-445
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W1715029947
Cited by
64
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
oral reading fluency, progress monitoring, curriculum-based measurement, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review