Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels

Fry, D. B., Abramson, Arthur S., Eimas, Peter D., Liberman, Alvin M.·1962·Language and Speech

Abstract

A series of thirteen two-formant vowels was synthesized and used as the basis of labelling and discrimination tests with a group of English-speaking listeners. The sounds varied only in F1/F2 plot and the resulting vowel qualities were such that listeners found no difficulty in assigning each sound to one of three phonemic categories, those of the vowels in bid, bed and bad. The results of the tests were compared with those previously obtained in experiments involving the consonant phonemes /b, d, g/. It appears from the data that the phoneme boundaries in the case of the three vowel phonemes are less sharply defined than in the case of the stop consonants. The labelling functions for the vowels show a gradual slope and the discrimination functions do not show any marked increase in sensitivity to change in the region of the phoneme boundaries. It is clear also that the listeners were able to discriminate differences very much smaller than would need to be distinguished simply in order to place vowels in the appropriate category. The results show further that the effect of sequence or acoustic context in the perception of vowels is very considerable. In all the aspects examined in these experiments, the perception of synthetic vowels is found to be different from that of synthetic stop consonants. These differences lend some support to the hypothesis that the degree of articulatory discontinuity between sounds may be correlated with the sharpness of the phonemic boundaries that separate them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002383096200500401

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M.
Venue
Language and Speech
Published
1962-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
171-189
ISSN
  • 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-6053
OpenAlex
W2157621600
Cited by
320
References
9
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002383096200500401
The paper
Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M. (1962). The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500401

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.