The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels
Abstract
A series of thirteen two-formant vowels was synthesized and used as the basis of labelling and discrimination tests with a group of English-speaking listeners. The sounds varied only in F1/F2 plot and the resulting vowel qualities were such that listeners found no difficulty in assigning each sound to one of three phonemic categories, those of the vowels in bid, bed and bad. The results of the tests were compared with those previously obtained in experiments involving the consonant phonemes /b, d, g/. It appears from the data that the phoneme boundaries in the case of the three vowel phonemes are less sharply defined than in the case of the stop consonants. The labelling functions for the vowels show a gradual slope and the discrimination functions do not show any marked increase in sensitivity to change in the region of the phoneme boundaries. It is clear also that the listeners were able to discriminate differences very much smaller than would need to be distinguished simply in order to place vowels in the appropriate category. The results show further that the effect of sequence or acoustic context in the perception of vowels is very considerable. In all the aspects examined in these experiments, the perception of synthetic vowels is found to be different from that of synthetic stop consonants. These differences lend some support to the hypothesis that the degree of articulatory discontinuity between sounds may be correlated with the sharpness of the phonemic boundaries that separate them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044417 · Cited by 1,690
Self-citationInformation Conveyed by Vowels
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1908694 · Cited by 768
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Kinney, J. A., & Lane, H. (1961) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0049038 · Cited by 300
Self-citationJoos, M. (1948) · Language · doi:10.2307/522229 · Cited by 200
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Eimas, P. D., Lisker, L., & Bastian, J. (1961) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383096100400401 · Cited by 83
Self-citationIdentification and Discrimination of a Phonemic Contrast Induced by Silent Interval
Bastian, J., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M. (1961) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1936842 · Cited by 36
Self-citationIdentification and Discrimination of Phonemic Vowel Duration
Bastian, J., & Abramson, A. S. (1962) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1937322 · Cited by 19
Self-citationIdentification and Discrimination of Phonemic Tones
Abramson, A. S. (1961) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1936844 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Cited by
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Self-citationThe Discovery of Spoken Language
Jusczyk, P. W. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2447.001.0001 · Cited by 936
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211209 · Cited by 689
Self-citationAuditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels
Pisoni, D. B. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214136 · Cited by 608
Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings
REPP, B. H. (1984) · Speech and Language · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1962-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 171-189
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2157621600
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002383096200500401
- The paper
- Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M. (1962). The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.