The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crosslanguage Differences in Tone Perception: a Multidimensional Scaling Investigation
Abstract
Using an individual differences multidimensional scaling model of perception, this crosslanguage investigation seeks to determine what dimensions underlie the perception of linguistic tone, and to what extent an individual's language background (Thai, Yoruba or American English) influences his perception. Dissimilarities data were obtained from subjects' paired-comparison judgments of 13 different pitch patterns superimposed on a synthetic speech-like syllable. A multidimensional scaling analysis of the data for the total group revealed that five dimensions - interpretively labeled, AVERAGE PITCH, DIRECTION, LENGTH, EXTREME ENDPOINT and SLOPE - best summarize the perceptual structure underlying the dissimilarities data. Language subgroup variation in relative importance of these dimensions appears to be primarily related to subgroup differences in the way pitch is used to convey linguistic information. Discriminant analysis showed that most individual speakers of a tone language (Thai or Yoruba) can be easily distinguished from speakers of a nontone language (English) on the basis of their distinctive patterns of perceptual saliency for these five dimensions. Regression analysis indicated that the DIRECTION and SLOPE dimensions closely correspond to certain earlier proposed binary distinctive features of tone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310791 · Cited by 4,678
Chao, Y. R. (1930) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 511
The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000900001598 · Cited by 299
Perceptual and Physical Space of Vowel Sounds
Pols, L. C. W., van der Kamp, L. J. T., & Plomp, R. (1969) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1911711 · Cited by 261
Determination and Proof of Minimum Uniqueness Conditions for PARAFAC1
Harshman, R. A. (1972) · Cited by 143
Self-citationKlatt, D. H. (1973) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1913333 · Cited by 125
On the Domain of Tone in Mandarin
Howie, J. M. (1974) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000259484 · Cited by 104
MULTIDIMENSIONAL PERCEPTUAL MODELS AND MEASUREMENT METHODS
Carroll, J. D., & Wish, M. (1974) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-161902-2.50019-5 · Cited by 100
Woo, N. H. (1969) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 97
APPLICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES SCALING TO STUDIES OF HUMAN PERCEPTION AND JUDGMENT
Wish, M., & Carroll, J. D. (1974) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-161902-2.50020-1 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Tone perception in Far Eastern languages
Gandour, J. (1983) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30813-7 · Cited by 473
Self-citationAccessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90016-2 · Cited by 462
Odlin, T. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch15 · Cited by 352
Xu, Y., Gandour, J. T., & Francis, A. L. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2213572 · Cited by 287
Self-citationTraining English and Chinese Listeners to Perceive Thai Tones: A Preliminary Report
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandour, J. T., & Harshman, R. A.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W1831766322
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crosslanguage Differences in Tone Perception: a Multidimensional Scaling Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002383097802100101
- The paper
- Gandour, J. T., & Harshman, R. A. (1978). Crosslanguage Differences in Tone Perception: a Multidimensional Scaling Investigation. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097802100101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.