The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Are Political Institutions Gendered?
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the role of institutions can help explain why gender equality policies often fail and why the efforts of gender equality advocates are frequently frustrated. Focusing on micro-foundations and using cases from comparative politics, the article builds a model that specifies the mechanisms whereby political institutions are systematically gendered. Political opportunities and outcomes are shaped not only by rules ‘about gender’ but also by seemingly neutral rules that have ‘gendered effects’, due to their interaction with institutions outside the realm of formal politics. Rules shape behaviour in gendered ways through mechanisms of regulation, obligation and persuasion. Actors reproduce gendered institutions through enacting rules, but they also generate change through adapting, resisting or reforming them. The article specifies concepts and methods for researching how political institutions are gendered within and across political systems. It also identifies points of intervention for those seeking to build more gender-just political institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Even rules that may on the face of them seem neutral can reflect, structure, and reinforce an asymmetrical allocation of opportunities, resources, and recognition between privileged and underprivileged groups (Kenney, 1996;Lowndes, 2020).”
From Intersectional power struggles in feminist movements: An analysis of resistance and counter‐resistance to intersectionality (2024) · cites this paper as Lowndes, 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Elinor Ostrom, B. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831739 · Cited by 5,287
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm · Cited by 4,229
Theories of the Policy Process
Sabatier, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367274689 · Cited by 3,515
Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005) · Cited by 3,427
Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592704040472 · Cited by 3,184
The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin
Mansfield, H. C. (1969) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2147153 · Cited by 3,092
Institutions and Social Conflict
Knight, J. C. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528170 · Cited by 2,464
Explaining Institutional Change
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806414 · Cited by 2,102
Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Ostrom, E. (2011) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x · Cited by 1,719
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bjarnegård E (2018) Men’s Political Representation. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Available at: http://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-214 (accessed 1 July 2019). · DOI
- Buechler S, 1990, Women’s Movement in United States: Woman Suffrage, Equal Rights and beyond
- Chappell L, 2017, Gender and Informal Institutions, 23
- Lovenduski J, 2005, Feminising Politics
- Lovenduski J, 2009, Roundtable Presentation at the European Conference on Politics and Gender
- March J, 1989, Rediscovering Institutions
- Piscopo J, 2017, Gender and Informal Institutions, 137
- Verge T, 2017, Gender and Informal Institutions, 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cooper, D. (2020) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026120915148 · Cited by 102
The gendered dimensions of informal institutions in the Australian construction industry
Galea, N. R., Powell, A., Loosemore, M., & Chappell, L. (2020) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12458 · Cited by 110
“As such, institutions are different to organizations, the latter being the ‘arena of action’ in which institutions operate (Lowndes, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialBerthet, V., & Kantola, J. (2020) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxaa015 · Cited by 88
“Feminist institutionalism helps to explain how MEPs and staff are embedded in settings where their actions are shaped and constrained by “institutional rules that distribute power along gendered lines” (Lowndes 2019, 5).”
Gender, Power and Privilege in the Parliamentary Workplace
Erikson, J., & Verge, T. (2020) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsaa048 · Cited by 52
Erikson, J., & Josefsson, C. (2020) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsaa049 · Cited by 89
“The relationship between the formal and the informal is multifaceted, and it can work in differing ways to either reinforce or subvert gender-power hierarchies (Waylen, 2017, p. 11; Lowndes, 2019).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowndes, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lowndes, Vivien
- ORCID
- Lowndes, Vivien
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-08-29
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-564
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2971269744
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- european research council (Understanding Institutional Change: A Gender Perspective)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- gendered institutions, gender equality policy, microfoundations, political institutions, gender and politics, regulation, persuasion, institutional change, gender justice, comparative politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
