Cited by 48Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Distributing Free Fresh Fruit and Vegetables at School: Results of a Pilot Outcome Evaluation

Open access
Coyle, Karin K., Potter, Susan, Schneider, Doris, May, Gary, Robin, Leah E., Seymour, Jennifer, Debrot, Karen·2009·Public Health Reports®

Abstract

Objectives.: Consumption of fruit and vegetables among children is generally below recommended levels. This evaluation addressed two questions: ( 1) To what extent did children's attitudes toward, familiarity with, and preferences for fruit and vegetables change during the school year? and ( 2) To what extent did children's consumption of fruit and vegetables change during the school year? Methods.: During the 2004–2005 school year, the Mississippi Department of Education, Child Nutrition Programs initiated a pilot program to distribute free fruit and vegetables to students (kindergarten through 12th grade) during the school day. Data were collected in 2004–2005 within a one-group pretest/posttest design using a self-report questionnaire ( n=725) and 24-hour dietary recalls ( n=207) with a sample of students from five schools in Mississippi. Data were analyzed in 2006–2007. Results.: Results showed greater familiarity with fruit and vegetables at all grade levels ( p<0.05) and increased preferences for fruit among eighth- and 10th-grade students ( p<0.01). Eighth-grade students also reported more positive attitudes toward eating fruit and vegetables ( p<0.01), increased perceived self-efficacy to eat more fruit ( p<0.01), and increased willingness to try new fruit. Finally, results showed increased consumption of fruit, but not vegetables, among eighth- and 10th-grade students ( p<0.001). Conclusions.: Distributing free fruit and vegetables at school may be a viable component of a more comprehensive approach for improving students' nutrition attitudes and behaviors. More program emphasis is needed on ways to promote vegetable consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003335490912400508

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coyle, K. K., Potter, S., Schneider, D., May, G., Robin, L. E., Seymour, J., & Debrot, K.
Affiliations
  • Education Training And Research (US)
  • Mississippi Department of Education (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Coyle, Karin K.
Venue
Public Health Reports®
Published
2009-09
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
660-669
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
OpenAlex
W120878502
Cited by
48
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (200-2002-00800)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
food preferences, food familiarity, self-efficacy, willingness to try new foods, child nutrition programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Diet Surveys, Female, Food Preferences, Food Services, Fruit, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mississippi, Nutritional Requirements, Pilot Projects, School Health Services, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review