Cited by 123

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors Affecting Guessing Vocabulary in Context

Liu Na, Nation, I.S.P.·1985·RELC Journal

Abstract

Low frequency words at two different densities in a text were replaced by nonsense words. The subjects were asked to guess the meanings of these words by using context clues. The results were analysed to see what factors affected difficulty of guessing. Words in the low density text (1 unknown word in 25) were easier to guess than words in the high density text (1 word in 10). Verbs were easier to guess than nouns, which were easier than adverbs and adjectives. The subjects were divided into proficiency levels according to their success at guessing. Groups of learners at high proficiency levels could successfully guess 85% to 100% of the unknown words. The group of learners at the lowest proficiency level tested guessed be tween 30% and 40% of the unknown words. From the results, it seems that learning the word guessing skill is best done by the class as a whole rather than individually. At first learners should work on verbs and nouns with plenty of understand able context. Research needs to be done on the effects of repetition on guessing, the types of words that learners need to guess, and the effect of teaching on improvement of the guessing skill.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003368828501600103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1016/0346-251X(80)90003-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01386.x · DOI
  3. 10.1177/003368827700800202 · DOI
  4. Li, Aiqun., 1983, Low frequency words in scientific writing. Unpublished paper
  5. 10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.327 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1945.tb00276.x · DOI
  7. West, Michael., 1953, A General Service List of English Words

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Na, L., & Nation, I. S. P.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University, China
  • Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Venue
RELC Journal
Published
1985-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
33-42
ISSN
  • 0033-6882
  • 1745-526X
Cited by
123
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review