The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors Affecting Guessing Vocabulary in Context
Abstract
Low frequency words at two different densities in a text were replaced by nonsense words. The subjects were asked to guess the meanings of these words by using context clues. The results were analysed to see what factors affected difficulty of guessing. Words in the low density text (1 unknown word in 25) were easier to guess than words in the high density text (1 word in 10). Verbs were easier to guess than nouns, which were easier than adverbs and adjectives. The subjects were divided into proficiency levels according to their success at guessing. Groups of learners at high proficiency levels could successfully guess 85% to 100% of the unknown words. The group of learners at the lowest proficiency level tested guessed be tween 30% and 40% of the unknown words. From the results, it seems that learning the word guessing skill is best done by the class as a whole rather than individually. At first learners should work on verbs and nouns with plenty of understand able context. Research needs to be done on the effects of repetition on guessing, the types of words that learners need to guess, and the effect of teaching on improvement of the guessing skill.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Firstly, it is well known that until the learner reads at a very high level of text comprehension and text coverage (i.e., one unknown word in 50 or so) little new vocabulary can be guessed from context (Liu and Nation, 1985; Laufer and Sim, 1985; Bensoussan and Laufer, 1984; Hu and Nation, 2000).”
From At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? (2003) · cites this paper as Liu and Nation, 1985
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1016/0346-251X(80)90003-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01386.x · DOI
- 10.1177/003368827700800202 · DOI
- Li, Aiqun., 1983, Low frequency words in scientific writing. Unpublished paper
- 10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.327 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1945.tb00276.x · DOI
- West, Michael., 1953, A General Service List of English Words
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66776 · Cited by 547
“Firstly, it is well known that until the learner reads at a very high level of text comprehension and text coverage (i.e., one unknown word in 50 or so) little new vocabulary can be guessed from context (Liu and Nation, 1985; Laufer and Sim, 1985; Bensoussan and Laufer, 1984; Hu and Nation, 2000).”
BackgroundRott, S. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004039 · Cited by 475
Vocabulary Demands of Television Programs
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x · Cited by 447
Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading
Cobb, T. (2007) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44117 · Cited by 238
Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44357 · Cited by 223
Pulido, D. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00217 · Cited by 181
Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43 · Cited by 95
Vocabulary Knowledge of Adult ESL Learners
Mokhtar, A. A., Rawian, R. M., Yahaya, M. F., Abdullah, A., Mansor, M., Osman, M. I., Zakaria, Z. A., Murat, A., Nayan, S., & Mohamed, A. R. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n1p71 · Cited by 43
Using glossaries to increase the lexical coverage of television programs
Webb, S. (2010) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66653 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Na, L., & Nation, I. S. P.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University, China
- Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
- Venue
- RELC Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-42
- ISSN
- 0033-6882
- 1745-526X
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review