Cited by 172Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisNF-κB Signaling PathwaysOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Experimental Design in Systems Biology, Based on Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Using a Monte Carlo Method: A Case Study for the TNFα-Mediated NF-κ B Signal Transduction Pathway

Cho, Kwang-Hyun, Shin, Sung-Young, Kolch, Walter, Wolkenhauer, Olaf·2003·SIMULATION

Abstract

Mathematical modeling and dynamic simulation of signal transduction pathways is a central theme in systems biology and is increasingly attracting attention in the postgenomic era. The estimation of model parameters from experimental data remains a bottleneck for a major breakthrough in this area. This study’s aim is to introduce a new strategy for experimental design based on parameter sensitivity analysis. The approach identifies key parameters/variables in a signal transduction pathway model and can thereby provide experimental biologists with guidance on which proteins to consider for measurement. The article focuses on applying this approach to the TNFα-mediated NF-κB pathway, which plays an important role in immunity and inflammation and in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. A mathematical model of this pathway is proposed, and the sensitivity analysis of model parameters is illustrated for this model by employing the Monte Carlo method over a broad range of parameter values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0037549703040943

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collectively fitting parameters by optimizing agreement between model and available data often yields large parameter uncertainties.

    “On the other hand, collectively fitting parameters [11,12] by optimizing the agreement between the model and available data often yields large parameter uncertainties [13–15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, K.-H., Shin, S.-Y., Kolch, W., & Wolkenhauer, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
  • Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK, Beatson Laboratories, Switchback Road, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Rostock, Albert Einstein Str. 21 18059 Rostock, Germany,
Corresponding author
Cho, Kwang-Hyun
Venue
SIMULATION
Published
2003-12
Volume
79
Issue
12
Pages
726-739
ISSN
  • 0037-5497 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3133
OpenAlex
W2166565152
Cited by
172
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIMULATION (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
experimental design, parameter sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo methods, signaling pathways, TNF-α, NF-κB signaling, parameter estimation, model reduction, inflammation, immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review