The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the “Mismatch” Hypothesis: Differences in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity
Abstract
This article evaluates the “mismatch” hypothesis, advocated by opponents of affirmative action, which predicts lower graduation rates for minority students who attend selective postsecondary institutions than for those who attend colleges and universities where their academic credentials are better matched to the institutional average. Using two nationally representative longitudinal surveys and a unique survey of students who were enrolled at selective and highly selective institutions, the authors tested the mismatch hypothesis by implementing a robust methodology that jointly considered enrollment in and graduation from selective institutions as interrelated outcomes. The findings do not support the “mismatch” hypothesis for black and Hispanic (as well as white and Asian) students who attended college during 1980s and early 1990s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
THE ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM OBSERVATIONAL DATA
Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.659 · Cited by 890
Models for Sample Selection Bias
Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1992) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001551 · Cited by 812
Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality?
Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229114 · Cited by 663
Cited by
Espinosa, L. (2011) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u · Cited by 585
College Readiness for All: The Challenge for Urban High Schools
Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., & Coca, V. (2009) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.0.0024 · Cited by 334
Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20054 · Cited by 268
Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209
Bleemer, Z. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab027 · Cited by 149
Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E., Coate, P., & Hotz, V. J. (2014) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Alon, S., & Tienda, M.
- Venue
- Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 294-315
- ISSN
- 0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8573
- OpenAlex
- W2104467519
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 41.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the “Mismatch” Hypothesis: Differences in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003804070507800402
- The paper
- Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “Mismatch” Hypothesis: Differences in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity. Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070507800402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.