Cited by 22Interprofessional Education and CollaborationPrimary Care and Health OutcomesTeam Dynamics and Performance

Developing High-Functioning Teams: Factors Associated With Operating as a “Real Team” and Implications for Patient-Centered Medical Home Development

Open access
Stout, Somava, Zallman, Leah, Arsenault, Lisa, Sayah, Assaad, Hacker, Karen·2017·INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing

Abstract

Team-based care is a foundation of health care redesign models like the patient-centered medical home (PCMH). Yet few practices rigorously examine how the implementation of PCMH relates to teamwork. We identified factors associated with the perception of a practice operating as a real team. An online workforce survey was conducted with all staff of 12 primary care sites of Cambridge Health Alliance at different stages of PCMH transformation. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with teamwork perceptions were conducted. In multivariate models, having effective leadership was the main factor associated with practice teamwork perceptions (odds ratio [OR], 10.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.39-20.43); in addition, practicing at a site in an intermediate stage of PCMH transformation was also associated with enhanced team perceptions (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.28-4.64). In a model excluding effective leadership, respondents at sites in an intermediate stage of PCMH transformation (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) and who had higher care team behaviors (such as huddles and weekly meetings; OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.30-8.92), higher care team perceptions (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.15-6.11), and higher job satisfaction (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.02-3.92) had higher practice teamwork perceptions. This study highlights the strong association between effective leadership, care team behaviors and perceptions, and job satisfaction with perceptions that practices operate as real teams. Although we cannot infer causality with these cross-sectional data, this study raises the possibility that providing attention to these factors may be important in augmenting practice teamwork perceptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0046958017707296

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Nielsen M Langner B Zema C Hacker T Grundy P Benefits of Implementing the Primary Care Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Review of Cost & Quality Results, 2012. Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stout, S., Zallman, L., Arsenault, L., Sayah, A., & Hacker, K.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • Health Resources in Action (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Zallman, Leah
Venue
INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
54
Pages
46958017707296-46958017707296
ISSN
  • 0046-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7243
OpenAlex
W2624855658
Cited by
22
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
patient-centered medical home, team-based care, teamwork, primary care practice transformation, leadership, job satisfaction, team perceptions, health care redesign
MeSH terms
Boston, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient-Centered Care, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review