Cited by 567Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The Group Health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers

Reid, Robert J., Coleman, Katie, Johnson, Eric A., Fishman, Paul A., Hsu, Clarissa, Soman, Michael P., Trescott, Claire E., Erikson, Michael +1 more·2010·Health Affairs

Abstract

As the patient-centered medical home model emerges as a key vehicle to improve the quality of health care and to control costs, the experience of Seattle-based Group Health Cooperative with its medical home pilot takes on added importance. This paper examines the effects of the medical home prototype on patients' experiences, quality, burnout of clinicians, and total costs at twenty-one to twenty-four months after implementation. The results show improvements in patients' experiences, quality, and clinician burnout through two years. Compared to other Group Health clinics, patients in the medical home experienced 29 percent fewer emergency visits and 6 percent fewer hospitalizations. We estimate total savings of $10.3 per patient per month twenty-one months into the pilot. We offer an operational blueprint and policy recommendations for adoption in other health care settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0158

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Group Health Cooperative reduced physician panel sizes, increased ancillary staff, lengthened visit times, and provided time for team care planning, in addition to expanding technology to better engage patients; comparison with control clinics demonstrated better patient satisfaction scores, reduced provider burnout, improved performance on quality of care metrics, and reduced emergency

    “The Group Health Cooperative reduced physician panel sizes, increased ancillary staff, lengthened visit times, and provided time for team care planning, in addition to expanding technology to better engage patients.Comparison with control clinics in the area demonstrated better patient satisfaction scores, reduced provider burnout, improved performance on quality of care metrics, and reduced”

    From The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance (2015) · cites this paper as [97]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reid, R. J., Coleman, K., Johnson, E. A., Fishman, P. A., Hsu, C., Soman, M. P., Trescott, C. E., Erikson, M., & Larson, E. B.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2010-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
835-843
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2056507942
Cited by
567
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 66
FWCI
99.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient-centered medical home, Group Health Cooperative, cost reduction, patient satisfaction, clinician burnout, emergency department visits, hospitalization, quality of care, health care costs, primary care reform, models of care
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, Washington, Cost Savings, Patient Satisfaction, Models, Organizational, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review