Cited by 220Healthcare Systems and PracticesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHealth Services Management and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waiting Time as an Indicator for Health Services Under Strain: A Narrative Review

Open access
McIntyre, Daniel, Chow, Clara K.·2020·INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing

Abstract

As pressure increases on public health systems globally, a potential consequence is that this is transferred to patients in the form of longer waiting times to receive care. In this review, we overview what waiting for health care encompasses, its measurement, and the data available in terms of trends and comparability. We also discuss whether waiting time is equally distributed according to socioeconomic status. Finally, we discuss the policy implications and potential approaches to addressing the burden of waiting time. Waiting time for elective surgery and emergency department care is the best described type of waiting time, and it either increases or remains unchanged across multiple developed countries. There are many challenges in drawing direct comparisons internationally, as definitions for these types of waiting times vary. There are less data on waiting time from other settings, but existing data suggest waiting time presents a significant barrier to health care access for a range of health services. There is also evidence that waiting time is unequally distributed to those of lower socioeconomic status, although this may be improving in some countries. Further work to better clarify definitions, identify driving factors, and understand hidden waiting times and identify opportunities for reducing waiting time or better using waiting time could improve health outcomes of our health services.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0046958020910305

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Schematic of the time patients spend waiting for care with examples from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.1,3,6,8-10,32,33
Figure 1. Schematic of the time patients spend waiting for care with examples from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.1,3,6,8-10,32,33CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Measurement of ED waiting times: Australia vs the United Kingdom.10,67 Note. UK: Total ED time refers to the time from arrival to discharge, transfer, or admission to hospital. Australia: ED wait times refer to the time from triage to first clinical contact. Being seen “on time” refers to first contact occurring within the clinically recommended time for each triage category: resuscitation (within seconds), emergency (within 10 min), urgent (within 30 min), semi-urgent (within 60 min) and nonurgent (within 120 min). ED = emergency department.
Figure 2. Measurement of ED waiting times: Australia vs the United Kingdom.10,67 Note. UK: Total ED time refers to the time from arrival to discharge, transfer, or admission to hospital. Australia: ED wait times refer to the time from triage to first clinical contact. Being seen “on time” refers to first contact occurring within the clinically recommended time for each triage category: resuscitation (within seconds), emergency (within 10 min), urgent (within 30 min), semi-urgent (within 60 min) and nonurgent (within 120 min). ED = emergency department.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Measurement of elective surgery waiting times: Australia vs the United Kingdom.1,29 Note. In UK, RTT time for elective surgery refers to the time from GP referral for consultant-led treatment to the initiation of this treatment. In Australia, elective surgery waiting time refers to the time from addition to removal from surgery waiting lists and does not include the time from GP referral. RTT = referral to treatment; GP = general practitioner.
Figure 3. Measurement of elective surgery waiting times: Australia vs the United Kingdom.1,29 Note. In UK, RTT time for elective surgery refers to the time from GP referral for consultant-led treatment to the initiation of this treatment. In Australia, elective surgery waiting time refers to the time from addition to removal from surgery waiting lists and does not include the time from GP referral. RTT = referral to treatment; GP = general practitioner.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Waiting-time trends in emergency departments and for elective surgery in Australia and NHS England, 2008/2009-2017/2018.1,6,9,10,22,26,83,84
Figure 4. Waiting-time trends in emergency departments and for elective surgery in Australia and NHS England, 2008/2009-2017/2018.1,6,9,10,22,26,83,84CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Elective surgery waiting time between 11 countries. Data from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 survey.25
Figure 5. Elective surgery waiting time between 11 countries. Data from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 survey.25CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Queensland Health, 2019, Queensland Reporting Hospitals Specialist Outpatient
  2. Victorian Agency for Health Information, 2019, Statewide—Median Wait Time for Urgent Specialist Clinic Appointment—All Specialties—Quarterly Data
  3. South Australia Health, 2019, Specialist Outpatient Waiting Time Report (Third Release)
  4. Tasmanian Health Service, 2019, Estimated Outpatient Waiting Times
  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018, Elective Surgery Waiting Times 2017/18
  6. NHS England, 2019, Hospital Accident and Emergency Activity, 2018-2019
  7. Anandaciva S. What Does the NHS England Review of Waiting Times Mean for Accident and Emergency Departments? The Kings Fund. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-england-review-waiting-times-accident-emergency. Published 2019. Accessed June 26, 2019.
  8. Miller P, 2017, Survey of Physician Appointment Wait Times and Medicare and Medicaid Acceptance Rates
  9. Gubb J, 2009, BMJ, 338, 442
  10. Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2017, Emergency Department Wait Times in Canada Continue to Rise
  11. Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2016, How Canada Compares: Results from The Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 International Health Policy Survey of Adults in 11 Countries—Accessible Report
  12. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, Australian Hospital Statistics 2011-2012: Emergency Department Care
  13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, Elective Surgery Waiting Times 2016-2017: Australian Hospital Statistics
  14. Haggerty J, 2018, Can Fam Physician, 64, e407
  15. Carrière G, 2010, Health Rep, 21, 7
  16. Ahmad BA, 2017, Malaysian family physician: the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 12, 14
  17. McMullen M, 2013, Clin Ophthalmol, 7, 1655
  18. Anderson RT, 2007, BMC Health Services Research, 7
  19. Ray KN, 2015, Am J Manag Care, 21, 567
  20. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018, Australian Hospitals 2016-2017 at a Glance
  21. Iacobucci G, 2019, BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 364, l1148
  22. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, Australian Hospital Statistics 2011-12: Elective Surgery Waiting Times
  23. NHS England, 2017, Hospital Accident and Emergency Activity: Supporting Information, 2016-2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McIntyre, D., & Chow, C. K.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
McIntyre, Daniel
Venue
INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Published
2020-01
Volume
57
Pages
46958020910305-46958020910305
ISSN
  • 0046-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7243
OpenAlex
W3021632058
Cited by
219
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1105447)
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (100808)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
waiting time, health care access, healthcare system strain, elective surgery waiting lists, emergency department waiting times, socioeconomic inequalities in health care, international comparability, health policy
MeSH terms
Australia, Emergency Service, Hospital, England, Europe, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Waiting Lists, Global Health, Elective Surgical Procedures, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review