Cited by 32Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Psychotherapeutic interventions for chronic pain: Evidence, rationale, and advantages

Majeed, Muhammad Hassan, Ali, Ali Ahsan, Sudak, Donna M·2019·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Background: Long-term use of opioids to treat chronic pain incurs serious risks for the individual—including misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose and death—as well as creating economic, social, and cultural impacts on society as a whole. Chronic pain and substance use disorders are often co-morbid with other medical problems and at the present time, primary care clinicians serve most of this population. Primary care clinicians would benefit from having alternatives to opioids to employ in treating such patients. Method: We electronically searched different medical databases for studies evaluating the effect of nonpharmacological treatments for chronic pain. We describe alternative approaches for the treatment of chronic pain and cite studies that provide substantial evidence in favor of the use of these treatments. Results: Cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based programs have well-documented effectiveness for the treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain. Integration of such behavioral health therapies into primary care settings may optimize health resources and improve treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Evidence-based psychotherapy for chronic pain has established efficacy and safety and improves quality of life and physical and emotional functioning. Such interventions may be used as an alternative or adjunct to pharmacological management. Chronic opioid use should be reserved for individuals undergoing active cancer treatment, palliative care, or end-of-life care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091217418791447

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Majeed, M. H., Ali, A. A., & Sudak, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Natchaug Hospital (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Majeed, Muhammad Hassan
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
140-149
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2885647399
Cited by
32
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
chronic pain, psychotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, opioid use, opioid misuse, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, primary care, substance use disorders, chronic non-cancer pain, behavioral health integration
MeSH terms
Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review