Cited by 73Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Relative Bioavailability of Lisdexamfetamine 70‐mg Capsules in Fasted and Fed Healthy Adult Volunteers and in Solution: A Single‐Dose, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study

Krishnan, Suma, Zhang, Yuxin·2008·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

The relative bioavailability of oral lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d‐amphetamine, and active d‐amphetamine was assessed in an open‐label, single‐dose, 3‐treatment, 3‐period, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy adult volunteers. Following a fast of at least 10 hours, subjects were administered an intact capsule of 70 mg lisdexamfetamine, a solution containing the capsule contents, or an intact capsule with a high‐fat meal. Standard meals started 4 hours following lisdexamfetamine administration. Blood samples were taken predose (0 hours) and 0.5 to 72 hours postdose, and the concentrations of d‐amphetamine and lisdexamfetamine were measured. AUC and Cmax for d‐amphetamine were similar when lisdexamfetamine 70 mg was administered to healthy adults in the fed or fasted state. The AUC of intact lisdexamfetamine was similar when the latter was taken without food or in solution, but Cmax was lower when lisdexamfetamine was administered with food. The tmax of d‐amphetamine and intact lisdexamfetamine was similar when taken in solution or in the fasted state but was about 1 hour longer when taken with food. Adverse events were typical for amphetamine products. These findings indicate that food does not have a significant effect on d‐amphetamine or lisdexamfetamine bioavailability in healthy adults and that lisdexamfetamine was well tolerated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270007310381

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time to reach maximal concentration was delayed by one hour when 70 mg of lisdexamfetamine was administered with food compared with the fasting state in healthy adult volunteers, but there was no change in Cmax levels.

    “Time to reach maximal concentration was delayed by one hour when 70 mg of lisdexamfetamine was administered with food compared with the fasting state in healthy adult volunteers, but there was no change in Cmax levels.14”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishnan, S., & Zhang, Y.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
293-302
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W2082580890
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine, d-amphetamine, relative bioavailability, food effect, fed versus fasted state, oral administration, prodrugs, pharmacokinetics, capsule formulation, drug solutions, healthy volunteers, adverse events
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Administration, Oral, Adult, Biological Availability, Blood Pressure, Capsules, Dextroamphetamine, Eating, Fasting, Female, Flushing, Half-Life, Headache, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Lysine, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Tachycardia, Molecular Structure, Food-Drug Interactions, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review