The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses
Abstract
Publics increasingly use social media during crises and, consequently, crisis communication professionals need to understand how to strategically optimize these tools. Despite this need, there is scarce theory-grounded research to understand key factors that affect how publics consume crisis information via social media compared to other sources. To fill this gap, an emerging model helps crisis managers understand how publics produce, consume, and/or share crisis information via social media and other sources: the social-mediated crisis communication model (SMCC). This study tests essential components of the SMCC model through a 3 (crisis information form) x 2 (crisis information source) x 2 (crisis origin) mixed-design experiment ( N = 338). The findings indicate the key role of crisis origin in affecting publics’ preferred information form (social media, traditional media, or word-of-mouth communication) and source (organization in crisis or third party), which influences how publics anticipate an organization should respond to a crisis and what crisis emotions they are likely to feel when exposed to crisis information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136
Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology
Comrey, A. L. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.5.754 · Cited by 1,154
Cited by
Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Chalil Madathil, K. (2022) · Human Factors in Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014 · Cited by 190
Tandoc, E. C., & Takahashi, B. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816642755 · Cited by 103
Application of social media analytics in tourism crisis communication
Park, D., Kim, W. G., & Choi, S. (2019) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2018.1504900 · Cited by 98
Keeping Up with the Tweet-dashians: The Impact of 'Official' Accounts on Online Rumoring
Andrews, C., Fichet, E., Ding, Y., Spiro, E. S., & Starbird, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2818048.2819986 · Cited by 98
Responding to a Health Crisis on Facebook: The Effects of Response Timing and Message Appeal
Huang, Y., & DiStaso, M. (2020) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101909 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-10-17
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-94
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2150545684
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093650211423918
- The paper
- Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (2014). Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.