Cited by 1,154Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and Psychology

Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology

Comrey, Andrew L.·1988·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.56.5.754

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comrey, A. L.
Corresponding author
Comrey, Andrew L.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1988
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
754-761
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W4240922193
Cited by
1,154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 30
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
factor analysis, scale development, personality assessment, clinical psychology, psychometric scale
MeSH terms
Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review