The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political Trust in Rural China
Open accessAbstract
This article shows that while some Chinese villagers see the state as monolithic, more believe that there are substantial differences between the central and local governments. Among those who perceive a divided state, most appear to have more trust in higher levels than in lower levels and distinguish between the intent and the capacity of the central government (“the Center”). They trust that the Center’s intent is beneficent but distrust its capacity to ensure faithful implementation of its policies. The article concludes that the central state has some breathing space because dissatisfaction with lower levels does not immediately generate demands for fundamental political reforms; in addition, the combination of trust in the Center’s intent and distrust in its capacity may encourage villagers to defy local officials in the name of the Center. If villagers’ rightful resistance fails, total disillusionment with the Center may set in, resulting in cynicism or radicalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110792 · Cited by 2,936
State Capacity and Local Agent Control in China: CCP Cadre Management from a Township Perspective
Edin, M. (2003) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0009443903000044 · Cited by 855
(1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511659959 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Rightful resistance in rural China
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3516 · Cited by 648
Spires, A. J. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/660741 · Cited by 629
China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval
Kostka, G. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819826402 · Cited by 316
Concealing Corruption: How Chinese Officials Distort Upward Reporting of Online Grievances
PAN, J., & CHEN, K. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000205 · Cited by 125
Online media and trust in government during crisis: The moderating role of sense of security
Zhu, Z., Liu, Y., Kapucu, N., & Peng, Z. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101717 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L.
- Venue
- Modern China
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-258
- ISSN
- 0097-7004 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6836
- OpenAlex
- W3125186843
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political Trust in Rural China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0097700403261824
- The paper
- Li, L. (2004). Political Trust in Rural China. Modern China. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700403261824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.